Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Modesto
vs
Rialto
State attribute explanation
Ca
vs
Ca
Street
1611 Scenic Drive
vs
1471 S Riverside
Zip Code
95,355
vs
92,376
Phone
2,095,235,667
vs
9,098,771,361
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
1
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
5
vs
2
Number of Certified Beds
99
vs
177
Total Number of Residents
74
vs
147
Percent of Occupied Beds
75 %
vs
83 %
Health Survey Date
10/20/2011
vs
9/2/2011
Fire Survey Date
10/26/2011
vs
9/7/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
5
vs
Staff Information
Number of Residents
74
vs
161
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.1
vs
0.41
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
vs
1.45
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.1
vs
1.87
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.07
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.07
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 09/09/2009date Of Correction: Not Available
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 04/22/2009date Of Correction: 08/04/2009
vs
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.survey Date: 04/22/2009date Of Correction: 08/04/2009
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 04/22/2009date Of Correction: 08/04/2009
vs
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.survey Date: 04/22/2009date Of Correction: 08/04/2009
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.8 %
vs
9.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
1.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.8 %
vs
1.9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14.3 %
vs
6.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7 %
vs
6.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.4 %
vs
8.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.9:1
vs
11.2-20
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
0.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
25.4 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.2:1
vs
33.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.5 %
vs
52.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95 %
vs
49.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.2 %
vs
1.50 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.9-28
vs
9.9:1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.8 %
vs
1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.8 %
vs
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
15 %
vs
8.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.8 %
vs
8.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
59.2 %
vs
40.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.2 %
vs
6.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13 %
vs
7.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
1.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
28.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8 %
vs
1.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.7 %
vs
27.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.8 %
vs
49.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.2 %
vs
39.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
12.6:1
vs
15.1 %
Compare ACACIA PARK NURSING & REHAB CENTER vs VISTA COVE CARE CENTER AT RIALTO Nursing Homes USA
cancel