VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Compare APPLE REHAB COCCOMO VS MEADOWBROOK OF GRANBY
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 47 differences and 31 similarities between APPLE REHAB COCCOMO, MEADOWBROOK OF GRANBY
 
General
City   Meriden vs   Granby  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Ct vs   Ct  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   33 Cone Ave vs   350 Salmon Brook Street  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   6,450 vs   6,035  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   2,032,381,606 vs   8,606,539,888  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
4
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
2
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
5
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
100
vs   90
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
85
vs   84
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
85 %
vs   93 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   11/18/2011 vs   2/2/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   11/16/2011 vs   1/31/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Fully Sprinklered vs   Fully Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicare And Medicaid vs   Medicare And Medicaid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   For Profit - Corporation vs   For Profit - Corporation  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   Yes vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Resident vs   Resident  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies   13 vs   7  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
85
vs   84
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.67
vs   0.73
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.91
vs   0.72
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.58
vs   1.46
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.17
vs   0.12
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.17
vs   0.12
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 11/18/2011date Of Correction: 12/30/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 09/01/2011date Of Correction: 10/14/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 11/18/2011date Of Correction: 12/30/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Environmental Deficiencies

cancel
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 06/16/2010date Of Correction: 07/28/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 06/16/2010date Of Correction: 07/28/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Mistreatment Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 12/29/2009date Of Correction: 02/02/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Each Resident A Notice Of Rights, Rules, Services And Charges. Tell Each Resident Who Can Get Medicaid Benefits About 1) Which Items And Services Medicaid Covers And Which The Resident Must Pay For.survey Date: 12/29/2009date Of Correction: 02/02/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Resident Rights Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Residents' Abilities In Activities Of Daily Living Do Not Decline, Unless Unavoidable.survey Date: 11/18/2011date Of Correction: 12/30/2011 vs   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 09/01/2011date Of Correction: 10/14/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 11/18/2011date Of Correction: 12/30/2011 vs   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 09/01/2011date Of Correction: 10/14/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 03/01/2011date Of Correction: 04/12/2011 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 02/11/2010date Of Correction: 03/25/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 03/01/2011date Of Correction: 04/12/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Deficiency #5   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 12/29/2009date Of Correction: 02/02/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #5”

Deficiency #6   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 12/29/2009date Of Correction: 02/02/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #6”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 12/29/2009date Of Correction: 02/02/2010 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 09/01/2011date Of Correction: 10/14/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Resident Assessment Deficiencies

cancel
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.survey Date: 09/01/2011date Of Correction: 10/14/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 06/17/2009date Of Correction: 07/29/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Administration Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
36.1 %
vs   15.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
2.9 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
4.1 %
vs   5.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
4.3 %
vs   10 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
11.9 %
vs   5.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder    vs   18.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
1.6 %
vs   1.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
1.4 %
vs   1.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
7.4 %
vs   3.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
75.2 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
40.4 %
vs   26.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
95.9 %
vs   100 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
95.9 %
vs   100 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
75.2 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
32.9 %
vs   21.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
2.7 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
5 %
vs   7.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
4.8 %
vs   7.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
9.8 %
vs   6.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
44.8 %
vs   21.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
2 %
vs   1.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
1.4 %
vs   2.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
9 %
vs   4.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
75.2 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
0.5 - 2.0
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
33.3 %
vs   20.7 (69.3)
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
95.3 %
vs   98.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
92.5 %
vs   100 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
13.2 %
vs   8.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare APPLE REHAB COCCOMO vs MEADOWBROOK OF GRANBY Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved