General
City		Plainville	vs	Stamford
	[X] Add Comment about “City”
State attribute explanation		Ct	vs	Ct
	[X] Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”
Street		269 Farmington Ave	vs	88 Rockrimmon Rd
	[X] Add Comment about “Street”
Zip Code		6,062	vs	6,903
	[X] Add Comment about “Zip Code”
Phone		8,607,471,637	vs	2,033,223,428
	[X] Add Comment about “Phone”
Overall Star Rating		4	vs	5
	[X] Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”
Health Inspections Star Rating		3	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”
Nurse Staffing Star Rating		4	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”
Quality Measures Star Rating		4	vs	5
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”
RN Only Star Rating		3	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”
Number of Certified Beds		173	vs	128
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”
Total Number of Residents		118	vs	116
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”
Percent of Occupied Beds		68 %	vs	91 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”
Health Survey Date		11/3/2011	vs	3/14/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”
Fire Survey Date		11/7/2011	vs	3/15/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”
Sprinkler Status		Fully Sprinklered	vs	Fully Sprinklered
	[X] Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”
Program Participation		Medicare And Medicaid	vs	Medicare And Medicaid
	[X] Add Comment about “Program Participation”
Type of Ownership		For Profit - Corporation	vs	Government - City
	[X] Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”
Located Within a Hospital?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?		Yes	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”
Resident and Family Councils		Resident	vs	Resident
	[X] Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”
Continuing Care Retirement Community?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”
Quality Indicator Survey?		Yes	vs	Yes
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”
Special Focus Facility?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”
Civil Money Penalty Count		75.2	vs	75.2
	[X] Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”
Total Enforcement Actions Count		75.2	vs	75.2
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”
# of deficiencies		11	vs	5
	[X] Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Staff Information
Number of Residents		118	vs	115
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Residents”
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.62	vs	0.98
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day		1	vs	0.5 - 2.0
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day		1.63	vs	1.48
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.08	vs	0.1
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.08	vs	0.1
	[X] Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 09/14/2010date Of Correction: 10/26/2010	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 10/08/2009date Of Correction: 11/13/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 04/13/2011date Of Correction: 05/25/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 11/03/2011date Of Correction: 12/15/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.survey Date: 04/13/2011date Of Correction: 05/25/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 04/13/2011date Of Correction: 05/25/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 11/03/2011date Of Correction: 12/15/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 12/01/2010date Of Correction: 12/28/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 09/14/2010date Of Correction: 10/26/2010	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 10/08/2009date Of Correction: 11/13/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 09/14/2010date Of Correction: 10/26/2010	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 10/08/2009date Of Correction: 11/13/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”
Deficiency #4		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 09/14/2010date Of Correction: 10/26/2010	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”
Deficiency #5		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.survey Date: 12/04/2009date Of Correction: 01/15/2010	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #5”
Deficiency #6		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 04/09/2009date Of Correction: 05/15/2009	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #6”

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 10/08/2009date Of Correction: 11/13/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		19.5-24	vs	10.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		75.2 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		17.4 %	vs	8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		75.2 %	vs	2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		11.8:1	vs	3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		36.8 %	vs	41.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		1.2 %	vs	6.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		1.1 %	vs	3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		5.7 %	vs	8.6:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		75.2 %	vs	1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		43.6 %	vs	8.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		88.1 %	vs	85.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		88.2 %	vs	91.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		0.6 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		6.7 %	vs	1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		18.7 %	vs	12.8:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		0.5 - 2.0	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		17.6 %	vs	12.1:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		3.1 %	vs	0.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		8.2 %	vs	5.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		36.3 %	vs	36.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		3.2 %	vs	4.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		1.2 %	vs	1.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		6 %	vs	12.8:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		75.2 %	vs	1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		4.2 %	vs	1.6 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		44.2 %	vs	12.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		85.3 %	vs	85.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		82.9 %	vs	76.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		14.6 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Compare APPLE REHAB FARMINGTON VALLEY vs SMITH HOUSE SNF Nursing Homes USA