General
City		Watertown	vs	Meriden
	[X] Add Comment about “City”
State attribute explanation		Ct	vs	Ct
	[X] Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”
Street		35 Bunker Hill Rd	vs	33 Cone Ave
	[X] Add Comment about “Street”
Zip Code		6,795	vs	6,450
	[X] Add Comment about “Zip Code”
Phone		8,602,745,428	vs	2,032,381,606
	[X] Add Comment about “Phone”
Overall Star Rating		4	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”
Health Inspections Star Rating		3	vs	2
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”
Nurse Staffing Star Rating		4	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”
Quality Measures Star Rating		3	vs	5
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”
RN Only Star Rating		3	vs	4
	[X] Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”
Number of Certified Beds		110	vs	100
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”
Total Number of Residents		99	vs	85
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”
Percent of Occupied Beds		90 %	vs	85 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”
Health Survey Date		5/26/2011	vs	11/18/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”
Fire Survey Date		5/26/2011	vs	11/16/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”
Sprinkler Status		Fully Sprinklered	vs	Fully Sprinklered
	[X] Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”
Program Participation		Medicare And Medicaid	vs	Medicare And Medicaid
	[X] Add Comment about “Program Participation”
Type of Ownership		For Profit - Corporation	vs	For Profit - Corporation
	[X] Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”
Located Within a Hospital?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?		Yes	vs	Yes
	[X] Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”
Resident and Family Councils		Resident	vs	Resident
	[X] Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”
Continuing Care Retirement Community?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”
Quality Indicator Survey?		Yes	vs	Yes
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”
Special Focus Facility?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”
Civil Money Penalty Count		1	vs	75.2
	[X] Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”
Total Enforcement Actions Count		1	vs	75.2
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”
# of deficiencies		6	vs	13
	[X] Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Staff Information
Number of Residents		99	vs	85
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Residents”
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.59	vs	0.67
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.72	vs	0.91
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day		1.31	vs	1.58
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.16	vs	0.17
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.16	vs	0.17
	[X] Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 11/18/2011date Of Correction: 12/30/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 11/18/2011date Of Correction: 12/30/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 05/26/2011date Of Correction: 07/07/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 06/16/2010date Of Correction: 07/28/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 10/29/2010date Of Correction: 12/10/2010	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 06/16/2010date Of Correction: 07/28/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 10/29/2010date Of Correction: 12/10/2010	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 12/29/2009date Of Correction: 02/02/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Each Resident A Notice Of Rights, Rules, Services And Charges. Tell Each Resident Who Can Get Medicaid Benefits About 1) Which Items And Services Medicaid Covers And Which The Resident Must Pay For.survey Date: 12/29/2009date Of Correction: 02/02/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/26/2011date Of Correction: 07/07/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Residents' Abilities In Activities Of Daily Living Do Not Decline, Unless Unavoidable.survey Date: 11/18/2011date Of Correction: 12/30/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 05/26/2011date Of Correction: 07/07/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 11/18/2011date Of Correction: 12/30/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 03/01/2011date Of Correction: 04/12/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”
Deficiency #4			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 03/01/2011date Of Correction: 04/12/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”
Deficiency #5			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 12/29/2009date Of Correction: 02/02/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #5”
Deficiency #6			vs	Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 12/29/2009date Of Correction: 02/02/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #6”

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 12/29/2009date Of Correction: 02/02/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews.survey Date: 05/26/2011date Of Correction: 07/07/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		31.6 %	vs	36.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		0.5 - 2.0	vs	2.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		16.5 %	vs	4.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		8.3 %	vs	4.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		6.8 %	vs	11.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		1.50 %	vs	1.6 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		6.6 %	vs	1.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		75.2 %	vs	7.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		75.2 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		41.5 %	vs	40.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		96.8 %	vs	95.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		96.5 %	vs	95.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		75.2 %	vs	75.2
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		5.1 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		29.8 %	vs	32.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		0.9 %	vs	2.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		13.7 %	vs	5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		10.2 %	vs	4.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		6.1 %	vs	9.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		59.4 %	vs	44.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		2 %	vs	2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		8.3 %	vs	1.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		75.2 %	vs	9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		75.2 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		4 %	vs	0.5 - 2.0
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		38.9 %	vs	33.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		93.7 %	vs	95.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		94 %	vs	92.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		17.3:1	vs	13.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Compare APPLE REHAB WATERTOWN vs APPLE REHAB COCCOMO Nursing Homes USA