Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Watertown
vs
Southbury
State attribute explanation
Ct
vs
Ct
Street
35 Bunker Hill Rd
vs
162 South Britain Rd
Zip Code
6,795
vs
6,488
Phone
8,602,745,428
vs
2,032,649,600
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
5
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
vs
5
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
110
vs
120
Total Number of Residents
99
vs
115
Percent of Occupied Beds
90 %
vs
96 %
Health Survey Date
5/26/2011
vs
8/4/2011
Fire Survey Date
5/26/2011
vs
8/4/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
1
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
1
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
6
vs
Staff Information
Number of Residents
99
vs
115
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.59
vs
0.89
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.72
vs
0.81
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.31
vs
1.7
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.16
vs
0.17
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.16
vs
0.17
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 05/26/2011date Of Correction: 07/07/2011
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 10/29/2010date Of Correction: 12/10/2010
vs
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 10/29/2010date Of Correction: 12/10/2010
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/26/2011date Of Correction: 07/07/2011
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 05/26/2011date Of Correction: 07/07/2011
vs
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews.survey Date: 05/26/2011date Of Correction: 07/07/2011
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.6 %
vs
23.7 (74.7)
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.5 %
vs
8.1 / 8.8
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.3 %
vs
1.50 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8 %
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.50 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.6 %
vs
7.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
3.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
41.5 %
vs
13.6-28
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.8 %
vs
89.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.5 %
vs
92.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.1 %
vs
5 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.8 %
vs
23 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 %
vs
0.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.7 %
vs
12.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.2 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.1 %
vs
5.6:1
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
59.4 %
vs
51.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2 %
vs
1.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.3 %
vs
6.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
6.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4 %
vs
3.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
38.9 %
vs
14.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.7 %
vs
67.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94 %
vs
91.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
17.3:1
vs
15.3 %
Compare APPLE REHAB WATERTOWN vs RIVER GLEN HEALTH CARE CTR Nursing Homes USA
cancel