VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Compare AURORA REHAB & LIVING CENTER VS EFFINGHAM REHAB & HEALTH CARE CTR
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 57 differences and 13 similarities between AURORA REHAB & LIVING CENTER, EFFINGHAM REHAB & HEALTH CARE CTR
 
General
City   Aurora vs   Effingham  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Il vs   Il  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   1601 North Farnsworth Avenue vs   1610 North Lakewood  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   60,505 vs   62,401  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   6,308,981,180 vs   2,173,477,781  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
1
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
1
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
3
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
3
vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
5
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
158
vs   62
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
126
vs   40
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
80 %
vs   65 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   3/22/2012 vs   9/22/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   3/14/2012 vs   10/12/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Fully Sprinklered vs   Not Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicare And Medicaid vs   Medicare And Medicaid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   For Profit - Corporation vs   For Profit - Corporation  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   No vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Resident vs   Resident  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
1
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies   5 vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
126
vs   40
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1
vs   1.17
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.39
vs   0.62
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.38
vs   1.78
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.09
vs   0.16
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.09
vs   0.16
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 02/15/2012date Of Correction: 04/04/2012 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Environmental Deficiencies

cancel
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 02/15/2012date Of Correction: 04/04/2012 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 05/14/2010date Of Correction: 06/07/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 08/17/2010date Of Correction: 09/15/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Mistreatment Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 05/14/2010date Of Correction: 06/07/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Resident Rights Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 06/18/2012date Of Correction: 06/29/2012 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 12/15/2011date Of Correction: 12/28/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.survey Date: 06/15/2010date Of Correction: 07/05/2010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

cancel
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature.survey Date: 06/18/2012date Of Correction: 07/09/2012 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
38.9 %
vs   48.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
0.9 %
vs   6.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
5.1 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
7.7 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
16.4 %
vs   7.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
30.8 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
7 %
vs   4.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
10 %
vs   17.9 (64.2)
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
3.5 %
vs   17.9 (64.2)
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
0.9 %
vs   7.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
36.4 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
85 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
57.3 %
vs   82.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
1
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
1.8 %
vs   7.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
41.6 %
vs   42.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
1.7 %
vs   6.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
5.1 %
vs   12.6:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
6.9 %
vs   16.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
22.8 %
vs   2.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
30.5 %
vs   44.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
6.8 %
vs   3.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
8.2 %
vs   19.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
5.6:1
vs   16.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
0.9 %
vs   9.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
2.1 %
vs   8.6:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
32.2 %
vs   33.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
85.1 %
vs   97.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
56.4 %
vs   76.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
13.6-28
vs   20 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare AURORA REHAB & LIVING CENTER vs EFFINGHAM REHAB & HEALTH CARE CTR Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved