Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Aurora
vs
Macomb
State attribute explanation
Il
vs
Il
Street
1601 North Farnsworth Avenue
vs
8 Doctors Lane
Zip Code
60,505
vs
61,455
Phone
6,308,981,180
vs
3,098,335,555
Overall Star Rating
1
vs
5
Health Inspections Star Rating
1
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
vs
5
RN Only Star Rating
5
vs
5
Number of Certified Beds
158
vs
80
Total Number of Residents
126
vs
67
Percent of Occupied Beds
80 %
vs
84 %
Health Survey Date
3/22/2012
vs
11/4/2011
Fire Survey Date
3/14/2012
vs
11/8/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
1
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
5
vs
1
Staff Information
Number of Residents
126
vs
67
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1
vs
1.17
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.39
vs
0.44
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.38
vs
1.61
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09
vs
0.29
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09
vs
0.29
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 02/15/2012date Of Correction: 04/04/2012
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 10/26/2011date Of Correction: 11/03/2011
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 02/15/2012date Of Correction: 04/04/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 08/17/2010date Of Correction: 09/15/2010
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 06/18/2012date Of Correction: 06/29/2012
vs
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Prepare Food That Is Nutritional, Appetizing, Tasty, Attractive, Well-cooked, And At The Right Temperature.survey Date: 06/18/2012date Of Correction: 07/09/2012
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
38.9 %
vs
9.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 %
vs
1.50 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.1 %
vs
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.7 %
vs
4.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
16.4 %
vs
2.20 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.8 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7 %
vs
11.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.5 %
vs
31.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.4 %
vs
5.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85 %
vs
97.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
57.3 %
vs
98.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.8 %
vs
2.20 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
41.6 %
vs
11 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.7 %
vs
1.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.1 %
vs
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.9 %
vs
3.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
22.8 %
vs
6.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
30.5 %
vs
30.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.8 %
vs
8.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.6:1
vs
29.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32.2 %
vs
13.9 / 15.3
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.1 %
vs
95.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
56.4 %
vs
96.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
13.6-28
vs
22.4:1
Compare AURORA REHAB & LIVING CENTER vs HEARTLAND OF MACOMB Nursing Homes USA
cancel