Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Winnfield
vs
Baton Rouge
State attribute explanation
La
vs
La
Street
342 Country Club Road
vs
11188 Florida Blvd
Zip Code
71,483
vs
70,815
Phone
3,186,284,152
vs
2,252,757,570
Overall Star Rating
1
vs
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
1
vs
1
Quality Measures Star Rating
1
vs
2
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
2
Number of Certified Beds
124
vs
104
Total Number of Residents
107
vs
68
Percent of Occupied Beds
86 %
vs
65 %
Health Survey Date
4/20/2012
vs
3/15/2012
Fire Survey Date
4/20/2012
vs
3/12/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
7
Staff Information
Number of Residents
107
vs
68
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.4
vs
0.54
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.76
vs
0.58
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.15
vs
1.12
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07
vs
0.08
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07
vs
0.08
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.survey Date: 04/22/2010date Of Correction: 05/17/2010
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.survey Date: 04/22/2010date Of Correction: 05/17/2010
Deficiency #3
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.survey Date: 06/25/2009date Of Correction: Not Available
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 04/22/2010date Of Correction: 05/17/2010
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 04/22/2010date Of Correction: 05/17/2010
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 04/22/2010date Of Correction: 05/17/2010
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.survey Date: 04/22/2010date Of Correction: 05/17/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.6 %
vs
43.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
29.1 %
vs
7.9:1
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.7 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8 %
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.4 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
15.1 %
vs
6.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8 %
vs
6.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
3.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
10 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.7 (69.3)
vs
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.6:1
vs
3.3 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.4 (88.5)
vs
41.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24 %
vs
8.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.4 %
vs
17.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.7 %
vs
6.6 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.3 %
vs
22.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
11.8:1
vs
6.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.1 %
vs
10.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6 %
vs
1.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
9.5 %
vs
1.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8 %
vs
3.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.4 %
vs
25.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.1 %
vs
94.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.8 %
vs
94.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
32.8 %
vs
23.8:1
Compare AUTUMN LEAVES NURSING AND REHAB CTR, LLC vs CARE CENTER THE Nursing Homes USA
cancel