Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Shelton
vs
Tolland
State attribute explanation
Ct
vs
Ct
Street
584 Long Hill Ave
vs
26 Shenipsit Lake Road
Zip Code
6,484
vs
6,084
Phone
2,039,295,321
vs
8,608,722,999
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
5
vs
5
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
5
vs
5
Number of Certified Beds
120
vs
130
Total Number of Residents
107
vs
114
Percent of Occupied Beds
89 %
vs
88 %
Health Survey Date
1/3/2012
vs
7/14/2011
Fire Survey Date
12/28/2011
vs
7/15/2011
Sprinkler Status
Partially Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Other
vs
Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
6
Staff Information
Number of Residents
107
vs
114
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.24
vs
1.36
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.69
vs
0.72
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.93
vs
2.08
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07
vs
0.25
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07
vs
0.25
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 04/20/2010date Of Correction: 06/01/2010
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Let Residents Voice A Complaint Or Grievance Without Being Treated Differently Or Badly.survey Date: 04/20/2010date Of Correction: 06/01/2010
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 01/24/2011date Of Correction: 02/21/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 04/20/2010date Of Correction: 06/01/2010
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Operate And Provide Services According To Federal, State, And Local Laws And Professional Standards.survey Date: 01/24/2011date Of Correction: 02/21/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Review The Work Of Each Nurse Aide Every Year; And 2) Give Regular In-service Training Based Upon These Reviews.survey Date: 11/16/2009date Of Correction: 12/03/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.6 %
vs
34.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0
vs
1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.6 %
vs
23.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.8 %
vs
3.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.2 %
vs
4.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
63.6 %
vs
32.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.4 %
vs
2.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.4 / 10.4
vs
5.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
8.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.6 %
vs
35.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.4 %
vs
93.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.8 %
vs
97.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3 %
vs
2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19 %
vs
35.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.3 %
vs
0.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.6 %
vs
20.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.5 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.6 %
vs
2.5 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
62 %
vs
38 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.7 %
vs
3.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.1 %
vs
7.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
8.9 / 9.9
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 %
vs
2.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
28.9 %
vs
38.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.8 %
vs
93.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.1 %
vs
96.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
9.5 %
vs
1.9 %
Compare BISHOP WICKE HEALTH & REHAB CT vs WOODLAKE AT TOLLAND Nursing Homes USA
cancel