Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Bradenton
vs
Melbourne
State attribute explanation
Fl
vs
Fl
Street
2010 Manatee Ave E
vs
606 E Sheridan Rd
Zip Code
34,208
vs
32,901
Phone
9,417,473,706
vs
3,217,270,984
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
2
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
2
RN Only Star Rating
1
vs
2
Number of Certified Beds
208
vs
120
Total Number of Residents
163
vs
107
Percent of Occupied Beds
78 %
vs
89 %
Health Survey Date
6/23/2011
vs
6/1/2012
Fire Survey Date
6/23/2011
vs
5/29/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
7
vs
Staff Information
Number of Residents
163
vs
107
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.32
vs
0.61
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.23
vs
1.38
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.55
vs
1.98
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15
vs
0.36
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15
vs
0.36
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 04/30/2010date Of Correction: 05/30/2010
vs
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Tell The Resident Completely About His Or Her Health Status, Care And Treatments.survey Date: 07/20/2011date Of Correction: 07/23/2011
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.survey Date: 04/30/2010date Of Correction: 05/30/2010
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.survey Date: 03/28/2012date Of Correction: 04/28/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.survey Date: 07/20/2011date Of Correction: 07/23/2011
vs
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 07/20/2011date Of Correction: 07/23/2011
vs
Deficiency #4
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 07/20/2011date Of Correction: 07/23/2011
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
42.3 %
vs
29.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.3:1
vs
12.4-2413.6-24
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.1 %
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.8 %
vs
17 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
39.5 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.3 %
vs
8.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
21.9 %
vs
11.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
15.1 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
30.2 %
vs
27.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 %
vs
98.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.7 %
vs
98.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.2 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9 %
vs
3.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
39.8 %
vs
27.8 (82.0)
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 %
vs
0.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.7 %
vs
16.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.3:1
vs
4.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.9 %
vs
12.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.8 %
vs
37.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.3 %
vs
8.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
14.3 %
vs
14.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.1 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
15.4 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 %
vs
4.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.6 %
vs
31.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 %
vs
98.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.3 %
vs
98.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
11.8:1
vs
12 %
Compare BRADEN RIVER CARE CENTER vs LIFE CARE CENTER OF MELBOURNE Nursing Homes USA
cancel