VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Compare BRISTOL NURSING HOME VS HIRAM W DAVIS MEDICAL CTR
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 54 differences and 13 similarities between BRISTOL NURSING HOME, HIRAM W DAVIS MEDICAL CTR
 
General
City   Bristol vs   Petersburg  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Va vs   Va  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   261 North Street vs   26317 West Washington Street  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   24,201 vs   23,803  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   4,237,646,151 vs   8,045,247,420  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
1
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
3
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
5
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
1
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
5
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
120
vs   83
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
93
vs   57
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
78 %
vs   69 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   3/31/2012 vs   9/21/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   3/26/2012 vs   9/27/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Fully Sprinklered vs   Fully Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicare And Medicaid vs   Medicare And Medicaid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   For Profit - Corporation vs   Government - State  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   Yes vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Resident vs   None  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   Yes vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
3
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
5
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies   
9
vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
93
vs   57
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.62
vs   1.74
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.44
vs   4.53
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.06
vs   6.28
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.06
vs   0.06
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.06
vs   0.06
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 11/07/2011date Of Correction: 11/30/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Environmental Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.survey Date: 03/10/2011date Of Correction: 03/25/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 03/10/2011date Of Correction: 03/25/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Resident Rights Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 06/07/2012date Of Correction: 06/18/2012 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 09/08/2010date Of Correction: 05/29/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 11/07/2011date Of Correction: 11/30/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Post-discharge Plan With The Resident And Family For The Resident's Care After Leaving The Nursing Home.survey Date: 06/07/2012date Of Correction: 06/18/2012 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Resident Assessment Deficiencies

cancel
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.survey Date: 11/07/2011date Of Correction: 11/30/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 11/07/2011date Of Correction: 11/30/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 03/10/2011date Of Correction: 03/25/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Add Comment about “Administration Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication    vs   13.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased    vs   9.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers    vs   4.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight    vs   2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder    vs   1.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection    vs   6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms    vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained    vs   11.8:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine    vs   44.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened    vs   74.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury    vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
17.4 %
vs   13.6-28
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased    vs   7.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
16.7 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
2.4 %
vs   5.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
11.1 %
vs   1.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
5.1 %
vs   3.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
6.5 %
vs   5.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
2.3 %
vs   1.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
75.2 %
vs   7.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
75.2 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain    vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine    vs   63.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened    vs   28.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare BRISTOL NURSING HOME vs HIRAM W DAVIS MEDICAL CTR Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved