Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
San Antonio
vs
Uvalde
State attribute explanation
Tx
vs
Tx
Street
5027 Pecan Grove
vs
200 Riverside Dr
Zip Code
78,222
vs
78,801
Phone
2,103,336,815
vs
8,302,785,641
Overall Star Rating
2
vs
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
1
vs
1
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
1
RN Only Star Rating
1
vs
1
Number of Certified Beds
222
vs
200
Total Number of Residents
137
vs
136
Percent of Occupied Beds
62 %
vs
68 %
Health Survey Date
4/12/2012
vs
4/26/2012
Fire Survey Date
4/11/2012
vs
4/25/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
2
vs
1
Staff Information
Number of Residents
137
vs
136
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.23
vs
0.42
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.26
vs
0.86
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.49
vs
1.28
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.04
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.04
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 02/04/2012date Of Correction: 02/05/2012
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 12/28/2010date Of Correction: 12/29/2010
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.survey Date: 10/22/2010date Of Correction: Not Available
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20 %
vs
18.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.8 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1 %
vs
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.4 %
vs
8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.8 %
vs
8.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
58 %
vs
37 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5 %
vs
14 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.2 %
vs
13.9 / 15.3
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.1 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.1 %
vs
13.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.4 %
vs
28.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.7 %
vs
87 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
79.3 %
vs
86.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9 %
vs
6.3 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.4:1
vs
19.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.4 %
vs
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5 %
vs
3.9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.4 %
vs
12.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.4 %
vs
5.9 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
54.8 %
vs
30.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.9 %
vs
12.4-2413.6-24
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.6 %
vs
12.8:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
18 %
vs
1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.3 %
vs
11.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 %
vs
5.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.5 - 2.0
vs
29.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.8 %
vs
86.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
80.6 %
vs
88.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
6.8 %
vs
3.1 %
Compare BUENA VIDA NURSING AND REHAB-SAN ANTONIO vs AMISTAD NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER LLC Nursing Homes USA
cancel