VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Compare CAMELLIA ESTATES VS LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CTR
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 41 differences and 23 similarities between CAMELLIA ESTATES, LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CTR
 
General
City   Mccomb vs   Booneville  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Ms vs   Ms  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   1714 White Street vs   100 Lauren Drive  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   39,648 vs   38,829  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   6,012,500,066 vs   6,627,200,972  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
4
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
3
vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
30
vs   80
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
28
vs   77
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
93 %
vs   96 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   12/20/2011 vs   9/8/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   12/21/2011 vs   9/9/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Fully Sprinklered vs   Fully Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicare vs   Medicare And Medicaid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   For Profit - Corporation vs   For Profit - Corporation  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Both vs   Both  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   Yes vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies    vs   2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
28
vs   77
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.9
vs   0.74
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.89
vs   1.03
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.79
vs   1.76
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.04
vs   0.01
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.04
vs   0.01
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 05/09/2011date Of Correction: 05/10/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Mistreatment Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 01/23/2012date Of Correction: 02/16/2012  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication    vs   31.4 (88.5)
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
75.2 %
vs   5.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain    vs   21.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers    vs   9.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight    vs   10.1:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder    vs   4.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection    vs   8.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms    vs   8.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained    vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
10.2 %
vs   17.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
95.9 %
vs   100 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
98.6 %
vs   100 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury    vs   5.7 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
17.1:1
vs   32.7 (90.9)
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
75.2 %
vs   4.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
3.9 %
vs   20.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers    vs   8.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
5.7 %
vs   7.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder    vs   30 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
10.3:1
vs   10.1:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
22.9 %
vs   11.8:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
2.9 %
vs   12.1:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
75.2 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
14.3 %
vs   5.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
14.8 %
vs   17.3:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
95.6 %
vs   100 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
99.1 %
vs   25.6 (78.1)
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
1.8 %
vs   3.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare CAMELLIA ESTATES vs LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CTR Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved