Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Mccomb
vs
Booneville
State attribute explanation
Ms
vs
Ms
Street
1714 White Street
vs
100 Lauren Drive
Zip Code
39,648
vs
38,829
Phone
6,012,500,066
vs
6,627,200,972
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
vs
1
RN Only Star Rating
4
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
30
vs
80
Total Number of Residents
28
vs
77
Percent of Occupied Beds
93 %
vs
96 %
Health Survey Date
12/20/2011
vs
9/8/2011
Fire Survey Date
12/21/2011
vs
9/9/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Yes
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
2
Staff Information
Number of Residents
28
vs
77
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.9
vs
0.74
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.89
vs
1.03
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.79
vs
1.76
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04
vs
0.01
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04
vs
0.01
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 05/09/2011date Of Correction: 05/10/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 01/23/2012date Of Correction: 02/16/2012
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
vs
31.4 (88.5)
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
5.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
21.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
vs
9.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
vs
10.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
vs
4.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
vs
8.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
vs
8.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.2 %
vs
17.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.9 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.6 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
vs
5.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.1:1
vs
32.7 (90.9)
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
4.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.9 %
vs
20.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
vs
8.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.7 %
vs
7.4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
30 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
10.3:1
vs
10.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
22.9 %
vs
11.8:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9 %
vs
12.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
14.3 %
vs
5.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.8 %
vs
17.3:1
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.6 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.1 %
vs
25.6 (78.1)
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.8 %
vs
3.2 %
Compare CAMELLIA ESTATES vs LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CTR Nursing Homes USA
cancel