Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Aberdeen
vs
Amory
State attribute explanation
Ms
vs
Ms
Street
505 Jackson St
vs
1126 Earl Frye Boulevard, South
Zip Code
39,730
vs
38,821
Phone
6,623,696,431
vs
6,622,579,919
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
3
RN Only Star Rating
4
vs
5
Number of Certified Beds
120
vs
60
Total Number of Residents
85
vs
55
Percent of Occupied Beds
71 %
vs
92 %
Health Survey Date
9/30/2011
vs
1/6/2012
Fire Survey Date
9/29/2011
vs
1/6/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
4
vs
3
Staff Information
Number of Residents
85
vs
55
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.82
vs
0.94
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.88
vs
0.86
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.7
vs
1.8
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
0.01
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
0.01
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/20/2010date Of Correction: 06/16/2010
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 05/27/2010date Of Correction: 07/09/2010
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 05/20/2010date Of Correction: 06/16/2010
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 11/14/2011date Of Correction: 12/14/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/27/2010date Of Correction: 07/09/2010
vs
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.survey Date: 04/28/2011date Of Correction: 06/12/2011
vs
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 05/27/2010date Of Correction: 07/09/2010
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.3 %
vs
30.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
vs
1.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.6 %
vs
11.6:1
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.9 %
vs
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.8 %
vs
16.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.8 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 %
vs
1.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.7 %
vs
12.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.5 %
vs
7.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
4.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
15.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
vs
6.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.8 %
vs
2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32 %
vs
30.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.4 %
vs
2.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.9 %
vs
12.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.7 %
vs
7.9:1
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9 %
vs
16.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
39.1 %
vs
22 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 %
vs
0.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.2 %
vs
10.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.4 %
vs
3.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.4 %
vs
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
16.7 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.1 %
vs
20.7 (69.3)
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.1 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
87.9 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
14.5 %
Compare CARE CENTER OF ABERDEEN vs RIVER PLACE NURSING CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel