Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Chatsworth
vs
Bremen
State attribute explanation
Ga
vs
Ga
Street
102 Hospital Drive
vs
315 Field Street
Zip Code
30,705
vs
30,110
Phone
7,066,958,313
vs
7,705,374,482
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
1
vs
1
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
vs
3
RN Only Star Rating
1
vs
1
Number of Certified Beds
120
vs
120
Total Number of Residents
95
vs
107
Percent of Occupied Beds
79 %
vs
89 %
Health Survey Date
12/1/2011
vs
3/3/2011
Fire Survey Date
12/1/2011
vs
3/3/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
2
vs
2
Staff Information
Number of Residents
95
vs
107
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.35
vs
0.29
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.88
vs
0.9
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.23
vs
1.19
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06
vs
0.04
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06
vs
0.04
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure There Is A Pest Control Program To Prevent/deal With Mice, Insects, Or Other Pests.survey Date: 08/26/2009date Of Correction: 10/09/2009
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.survey Date: 05/16/2012date Of Correction: 06/29/2012
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 08/26/2009date Of Correction: 10/09/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible.survey Date: 01/26/2010date Of Correction: 03/12/2010
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
59.7 %
vs
27.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.9 %
vs
24.6 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.5 %
vs
8.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
14.6 %
vs
4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
36.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7.9:1
vs
4.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11 %
vs
6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12.7 %
vs
5.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.1 %
vs
2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10 %
vs
33.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.7 %
vs
92.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.7 %
vs
97.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.6 %
vs
2.9 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
56.7 %
vs
26.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.6 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.50 %
vs
26.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.5 %
vs
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.9 %
vs
4.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.6 %
vs
38.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.3 %
vs
4.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.8 %
vs
6.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
17.1:1
vs
4.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.8 %
vs
2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.9 %
vs
2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14 %
vs
40.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99 %
vs
87.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
12.6:1
vs
93.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.7 %
vs
22.8 %
Compare CHATSWORTH HEALTH CARE CENTER vs HARALSON NSG & REHAB CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel