Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Cheraw
vs
White Rock
State attribute explanation
Sc
vs
Sc
Street
400 Moffat Road
vs
201 Fortress Drive
Zip Code
29,520
vs
29,177
Phone
8,435,375,253
vs
8,037,323,000
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
vs
5
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
120
vs
176
Total Number of Residents
113
vs
146
Percent of Occupied Beds
94 %
vs
83 %
Health Survey Date
6/1/2011
vs
5/3/2012
Fire Survey Date
6/1/2011
vs
5/3/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
Non Profit - Church Related
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
Yes
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
3
vs
3
Staff Information
Number of Residents
114
vs
146
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.42
vs
0.6
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.73
vs
1.1
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.16
vs
1.7
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
0.07
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.01
vs
0.07
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 04/14/2010date Of Correction: 04/14/2010
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 08/26/2009date Of Correction: 09/26/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Who Enters The Nursing Home Without A Catheter Is Not Given A Catheter, And Receive Proper Services To Prevent Urinary Tract Infections And Restore Normal Bladder Function.survey Date: 04/14/2010date Of Correction: 04/22/2010
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 12/02/2009date Of Correction: 01/02/2010
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 04/14/2010date Of Correction: 04/22/2010
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 08/26/2009date Of Correction: 09/26/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.7 %
vs
25 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.2 %
vs
0.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.9 / 9.9
vs
5.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.8 %
vs
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.6 / 3
vs
8.9 / 9.9
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
52.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 %
vs
2.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.4 %
vs
5.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
1.50 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.5 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
9.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 %
vs
90.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 %
vs
90.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.6 / 3
vs
0.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.2 %
vs
25.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.8 %
vs
0.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.3:1
vs
4.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.9 %
vs
4.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5 %
vs
7.6 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.8:1
vs
53.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 %
vs
2.20 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.2 %
vs
4.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.6 %
vs
1.50 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.5 %
vs
2.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.6 / 3
vs
0.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
31.2 %
vs
8.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 %
vs
90 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 %
vs
91.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
11.8:1
vs
8.5 %
Compare CHERAW HEALTHCARE vs THE HERITAGE AT LOWMAN REHAB AND HEALTHCARE Nursing Homes USA
cancel