Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Wheat Ridge
vs
Centennial
State attribute explanation
Co
vs
Co
Street
6270 West 38th Avenue
vs
5000 East Arapahoe Road
Zip Code
80,033
vs
80,122
Phone
3,034,212,272
vs
3,037,795,000
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
4
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
72
vs
93
Total Number of Residents
68
vs
79
Percent of Occupied Beds
94 %
vs
85 %
Health Survey Date
7/14/2011
vs
3/14/2012
Fire Survey Date
8/10/2011
vs
4/4/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
Yes
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
5
vs
Staff Information
Number of Residents
68
vs
79
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.75
vs
0.68
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.82
vs
0.85
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.56
vs
1.54
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08
vs
0.07
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08
vs
0.07
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 07/09/2009date Of Correction: 07/09/2009
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Treatment/services To Not Only Continue, But Improve The Ability To Care For Themselves.survey Date: 12/08/2010date Of Correction: 01/07/2011
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 12/08/2010date Of Correction: 01/07/2011
vs
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 10/19/2009date Of Correction: 11/13/2009
vs
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Food In A Way That Meets A Resident's Needs.survey Date: 10/19/2009date Of Correction: 11/13/2009
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.7 %
vs
25.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.6 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
35 %
vs
11.1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
75.2 %
vs
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.1 %
vs
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
40 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
15.8 %
vs
4.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.1 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.2 %
vs
2.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
38.9 %
vs
16.9-24
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
76.8 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
85.5 %
vs
86.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.1 %
vs
2.8 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.4 %
vs
21 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4 %
vs
0.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.3 %
vs
6 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.8 %
vs
8.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.6 %
vs
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25 %
vs
45.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
13.6-28
vs
4.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.5 %
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.1 / 8.8
vs
1.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
0.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4 %
vs
1.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.4 %
vs
22 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.1 %
vs
72.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
77.3 %
vs
71.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.7 %
vs
33.5 %
Compare CHRISTOPHER HOUSE REHABILITATION AND CARE COMMUNIT vs CHRISTIAN LIVING COMMUNITIES THE JOHNSON CENTER SK Nursing Homes USA
cancel