VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Compare CLAIBORNE SENIOR CARE VS WISTERIA GARDENS
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 43 differences and 20 similarities between CLAIBORNE SENIOR CARE, WISTERIA GARDENS
 
General
City   Port Gibson vs   Pearl  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Ms vs   Ms  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   2124 Old Hwy 61 South/p. O. Box 1018 vs   5420 Highway 80 East  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   39,150 vs   39,208  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   6,014,378,737 vs   6,019,886,800  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
5
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
3
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
5
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
77
vs   52
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
64
vs   41
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
83 %
vs   79 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   4/6/2012 vs   12/15/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   4/5/2012 vs   12/14/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Fully Sprinklered vs   Fully Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicare And Medicaid vs   Medicare  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   For Profit - Corporation vs   For Profit - Partnership  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Resident vs   None  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   No vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
75.2
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies   
3
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
64
vs   41
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.63
vs   0.98
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.21
vs   1.67
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.83
vs   2.65
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.09
vs   0.37
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.09
vs   0.37
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 12/21/2009date Of Correction: 01/19/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Environmental Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 12/21/2009date Of Correction: 12/26/2009 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 12/21/2009date Of Correction: 01/19/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
46.3 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
75.2 %
vs   0.5 - 2.0
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
6.6 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
1.7 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
1.9 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
3.4 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
75.2 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
75.2 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
100 %
vs   99.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
95.5 %
vs   99.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication    vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
75.2 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
43.7 %
vs   2.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
1.7 %
vs   0.5 - 2.0
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
4.9 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
5.3 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
2.8 %
vs   5.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
39.1 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
2.6 / 3
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
1.7 %
vs   5.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
75.2 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
75.2 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
75.2 %
vs   5.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
14.7:1
vs   1.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
100 %
vs   97.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
96.7 %
vs   98.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
9.4 / 10.4
vs   0.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare CLAIBORNE SENIOR CARE vs WISTERIA GARDENS Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved