Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Miami
vs
Pensacola
State attribute explanation
Fl
vs
Fl
Street
7060 Sw 8th Street
vs
4343 Langley Avenue
Zip Code
33,144
vs
32,504
Phone
3,052,611,363
vs
8,504,774,550
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
3
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
87
vs
120
Total Number of Residents
85
vs
113
Percent of Occupied Beds
98 %
vs
94 %
Health Survey Date
9/29/2011
vs
10/13/2011
Fire Survey Date
10/5/2011
vs
10/13/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
85
vs
113
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.51
vs
0.77
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.99
vs
0.81
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.50
vs
1.58
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11
vs
0.07
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11
vs
0.07
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That A Working Call System Is Available In Each Resident's Room Or Bathroom And Bathing Area.survey Date: 09/13/2011date Of Correction: 09/30/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.survey Date: 09/13/2011date Of Correction: 09/30/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 03/19/2010date Of Correction: 04/29/2010
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Coordinate Assessments With The Pre-admission Screening And Resident Review Program For Mentally-ill And Mentally-retarded Patients.survey Date: 06/21/2011date Of Correction: 06/30/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
34.9 %
vs
19.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.1 %
vs
24.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.5 %
vs
9.4 / 10.4
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.50 %
vs
20.6 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
34.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.9 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
18.2:1
vs
12.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.50 %
vs
7.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 %
vs
34.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.9 %
vs
74 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
91.8 %
vs
79.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
10.3:1
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.50 %
vs
3 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
31.6 %
vs
21.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
0.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3 %
vs
21.1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.6 %
vs
9.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.9 %
vs
13.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
29 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
14 %
vs
12.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.4 %
vs
7.9:1
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
1.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.1 %
vs
33.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.3 %
vs
76.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
87.3 %
vs
81.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
31.5 %
vs
6.3 %
Compare CORAL GABLES NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER vs BAYSIDE MANOR Nursing Homes USA
cancel