VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Overview:

There are 62 differences and 21 similarities between CRESTFIELD REHABILITATION CENTER & FENWOOD MANOR, PINES AT BRISTOL FOR NURSING & REHABILITATION, THE
 
General
City   Manchester vs   Bristol  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Ct vs   Ct  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   565 Vernon St vs   61 Bellevue Avenue  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   6,040 vs   6,010  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   8,606,435,151 vs   8,605,891,682  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
1
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
1
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
3
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
1
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
2
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
155
vs   132
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
123
vs   131
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
79 %
vs   99 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   2/27/2012 vs   10/27/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   2/22/2012 vs   10/26/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Fully Sprinklered vs   Fully Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicare And Medicaid vs   Medicare And Medicaid  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   For Profit - Corporation vs   For Profit - Corporation  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Resident vs   Resident  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   Yes vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
1
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
1
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies   16 vs   12  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
123
vs   131
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.54
vs   0.61
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.09
vs   0.65
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.63
vs   1.26
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.3
vs   0.09
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.3
vs   0.09
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 12/20/2011date Of Correction: 02/03/2012 vs   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Safe, Easy To Use, Clean And Comfortable For Residents, Staff And The Public.survey Date: 06/09/2011date Of Correction: 09/08/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 01/18/2011date Of Correction: 03/01/2011 vs   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 06/09/2011date Of Correction: 09/08/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 04/14/2011date Of Correction: 05/26/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 06/01/2009date Of Correction: 07/13/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Add Comment about “Environmental Deficiencies

cancel
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 10/27/2011date Of Correction: 12/08/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Mistreatment Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 02/27/2012date Of Correction: 04/09/2012 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 12/20/2011date Of Correction: 02/03/2012 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Determine If It Is Safe For The Resident To Self-administer Drugs.survey Date: 05/18/2010date Of Correction: 06/29/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 03/12/2010date Of Correction: 04/23/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Add Comment about “Resident Rights Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 02/27/2012date Of Correction: 04/09/2012 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 10/27/2011date Of Correction: 12/08/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 12/20/2011date Of Correction: 02/03/2012 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 10/27/2011date Of Correction: 12/08/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 12/20/2011date Of Correction: 02/03/2012 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 06/01/2009date Of Correction: 07/13/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/18/2010date Of Correction: 06/29/2010 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 06/01/2009date Of Correction: 07/13/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Deficiency #5   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 05/18/2010date Of Correction: 06/29/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #5”

Deficiency #6   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 05/18/2010date Of Correction: 06/29/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #6”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 02/27/2012date Of Correction: 04/09/2012 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 10/27/2011date Of Correction: 12/08/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 12/20/2011date Of Correction: 02/03/2012 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Doctors See A Resident's Plan Of Care At Every Visit And Make Notes About Progress And Orders In Writing.survey Date: 05/18/2010date Of Correction: 06/29/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Add Comment about “Resident Assessment Deficiencies

cancel
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 05/18/2010date Of Correction: 06/29/2010 vs   Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 06/01/2009date Of Correction: 07/13/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Administration Deficiencies

cancel
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.survey Date: 06/01/2009date Of Correction: 07/13/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
18.3 %
vs   18.2:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
2.20 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
13.1:1
vs   7.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
4.2 %
vs   3.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
7.5 %
vs   4.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
40 %
vs   55.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
6 %
vs   1.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
11.8:1
vs   4.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
3.2 %
vs   10 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
4.3 %
vs   0.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
28.5 %
vs   22.4:1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
82.5 %
vs   58.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
85.9 %
vs   70.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
75.2
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
2.1 %
vs   4.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
19.9 %
vs   19.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
2.9 %
vs   75.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
12.5 %
vs   4.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
6.1 %
vs   2.20 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
8.8 %
vs   3.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
48.2 %
vs   51.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
4.9 %
vs   2.20 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
13.9 / 15.3
vs   5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
6.6 %
vs   10.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
6.6 %
vs   0.3 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
2.1 %
vs   4.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
27.7 %
vs   17 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
69.4 %
vs   66.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
84.9 %
vs   75.4 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
3.2 %
vs   17 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare CRESTFIELD REHABILITATION CENTER & FENWOOD MANOR vs PINES AT BRISTOL FOR NURSING & REHABILITATION, THE Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved