Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
New London
vs
Norwalk
State attribute explanation
Ct
vs
Ct
Street
89 Viets St Ext
vs
76 West Rock Road
Zip Code
6,320
vs
6,851
Phone
8,604,471,471
vs
2,038,475,893
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
1
RN Only Star Rating
4
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
66
vs
60
Total Number of Residents
58
vs
58
Percent of Occupied Beds
88 %
vs
97 %
Health Survey Date
5/17/2012
vs
3/16/2011
Fire Survey Date
5/17/2012
vs
3/16/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
Non Profit - Church Related
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
1
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
1
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
6
vs
Staff Information
Number of Residents
58
vs
59
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.73
vs
0.65
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.71
vs
0.66
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.44
vs
1.3
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02
vs
0.06
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.02
vs
0.06
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 07/26/2010date Of Correction: 09/06/2010
vs
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 02/02/2010date Of Correction: 03/16/2010
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 05/17/2012date Of Correction: 06/25/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 07/26/2010date Of Correction: 09/06/2010
vs
Deficiency #3
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 07/07/2009date Of Correction: 08/18/2009
vs
Deficiency #4
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 07/07/2009date Of Correction: 08/18/2009
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
38.8 %
vs
27.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.6 %
vs
13.1:1
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.7 %
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.8 %
vs
8.9 / 9.9
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
16.5 %
vs
9.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
9.6 %
vs
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.4 / 10.4
vs
1.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3.8 %
vs
3.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.2:1
vs
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.8 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
76.3 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 %
vs
5.4 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
38.6 %
vs
33.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.8 %
vs
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10 %
vs
16.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.1 %
vs
8.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.5 %
vs
6.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.3 %
vs
58.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
14.4 %
vs
7.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.1 %
vs
4.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.4 / 10.4
vs
3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.3 %
vs
4.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.6 %
vs
28.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.2:1
vs
16.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.7 %
vs
70 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
43.8 %
vs
55.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.8 %
vs
21.2:1
Compare CROSSINGS WEST CAMPUS, THE vs NOTRE DAME CONVALESCENT HOME I Nursing Homes USA
cancel