Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Town And Country
vs
Sullivan
State attribute explanation
Mo
vs
Mo
Street
13550 South Outer 40 Road
vs
875 Dunsford Drive
Zip Code
63,017
vs
63,080
Phone
3,148,781,330
vs
5,734,683,128
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
2
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
321
vs
120
Total Number of Residents
269
vs
63
Percent of Occupied Beds
84 %
vs
53 %
Health Survey Date
8/25/2011
vs
11/10/2011
Fire Survey Date
8/25/2011
vs
11/10/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
5
vs
1
Staff Information
Number of Residents
269
vs
63
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.43
vs
0.61
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.39
vs
0.92
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.83
vs
1.52
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.18
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.18
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 07/29/2010date Of Correction: 09/14/2010
vs
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 02/25/2010date Of Correction: 03/16/2010
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 10/06/2011date Of Correction: 11/11/2011
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 08/04/2011date Of Correction: 09/09/2011
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 08/25/2011date Of Correction: 10/19/2011
vs
Deficiency #3
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 10/09/2009date Of Correction: 12/07/2009
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.5 %
vs
29.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.1 %
vs
18.6 (65.5)
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5 %
vs
9.4 / 10.4
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.7 %
vs
14 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.7 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 %
vs
4.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.4 %
vs
10 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.6:1
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.8 %
vs
4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.2:1
vs
30.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.1 %
vs
94.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.8 %
vs
98.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.5 %
vs
4 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.7 %
vs
31.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.1 %
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.7:1
vs
13.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.7 %
vs
7.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7 %
vs
15.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.6 %
vs
13.9 / 15.3
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.5 %
vs
6.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.3:1
vs
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.3 %
vs
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.3 %
vs
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.6 %
vs
5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.6 %
vs
42.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.5 %
vs
95.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.9 %
vs
99.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
13.9 / 15.3
vs
10.2 %
Compare DELMAR GARDENS WEST vs LIFE CARE CENTER OF SULLIVAN Nursing Homes USA
cancel