Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Santee
vs
Carmichael
State attribute explanation
Ca
vs
Ca
Street
655 Park Center Drive
vs
2540 Carmichael Way
Zip Code
92,071
vs
95,608
Phone
6,195,965,500
vs
9,164,820,465
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
5
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
5
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
192
vs
178
Total Number of Residents
190
vs
150
Percent of Occupied Beds
99 %
vs
84 %
Health Survey Date
8/11/2011
vs
12/1/2011
Fire Survey Date
8/17/2011
vs
12/7/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Government - City/county
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
Yes
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
2
vs
3
Staff Information
Number of Residents
190
vs
150
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.26
vs
0.64
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.49
vs
0.87
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.75
vs
1.52
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06
vs
0.12
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06
vs
0.12
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 05/04/2012date Of Correction: 06/30/2012
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 07/03/2009date Of Correction: 08/06/2009
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Reasonably Accommodate The Needs And Preferences Of Each Resident.survey Date: 05/04/2012date Of Correction: 06/30/2012
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Provide Enough Notice Before Discharging Or Transferring A Resident.survey Date: 12/14/2010date Of Correction: 02/07/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Provide Written Records When A Resident Is Transferred Or Discharged.survey Date: 12/14/2010date Of Correction: 02/07/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.1 (71.8)
vs
22 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.1 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.5 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.7 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.6 %
vs
43.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.4 %
vs
7.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.2 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.1 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
21.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85 %
vs
91.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.2 %
vs
99.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 %
vs
2.5 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.1 (71.8)
vs
22.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.9 %
vs
5.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.6 %
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
49.1 %
vs
41.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 %
vs
7.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.4 %
vs
4.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.4 %
vs
4.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.20 %
vs
3.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
36.8 %
vs
24.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.1 %
vs
88.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.9 %
vs
95.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
vs
8.1 / 8.8
Compare EDGEMOOR HOSPITAL vs WINDSOR EL CAMINO CARE CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel