Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Reseda
vs
Fairfield
State attribute explanation
Ca
vs
Ca
Street
18855 Victory Bl
vs
1260 Travis Blvd
Zip Code
91,335
vs
94,533
Phone
8,187,743,000
vs
7,074,250,669
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
2
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
5
Number of Certified Beds
166
vs
90
Total Number of Residents
165
vs
73
Percent of Occupied Beds
99 %
vs
81 %
Health Survey Date
5/24/2011
vs
1/26/2012
Fire Survey Date
6/3/2011
vs
2/1/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Yes
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
5
Staff Information
Number of Residents
165
vs
73
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.37
vs
1.07
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.92
vs
0.27
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.28
vs
1.34
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08
vs
0.08
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.08
vs
0.08
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 07/17/2009date Of Correction: 03/09/2011
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 04/05/2012date Of Correction: 06/01/2012
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 04/05/2012date Of Correction: 06/01/2012
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 04/05/2012date Of Correction: 06/01/2012
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Train All Employees On What To Do In An Emergency, And Carry Out Announced Staff Drills.survey Date: 11/19/2010date Of Correction: 01/26/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.1 %
vs
13.6-28
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
vs
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.3 %
vs
9.4 / 10.4
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.9 %
vs
10.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.4 %
vs
9.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
61.1 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.5 %
vs
6.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8 %
vs
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.5 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.6 %
vs
1.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
vs
69 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
vs
69 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5 %
vs
75.2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29 %
vs
15.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.4 %
vs
8.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.4 %
vs
11.6:1
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5 %
vs
6.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57.4 %
vs
51.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.20 %
vs
7.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3 %
vs
8.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.6 %
vs
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
13.7 %
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.4 %
vs
37.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.6 %
vs
68.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
84.3 %
vs
69.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
vs
75.2 %
Compare EISENBERG VILLAGE vs GREENFIELD CARE CENTER OF FAIRFIELD Nursing Homes USA
cancel