VS

Home > Nursing Homes USA > Comparison

Compare ELLEN SAGAR NURSING HOME VS SUMMIT HILLS SKILLED NURSING FACILITY
Add another Item to this comparison  Add Item

Overview:

There are 65 differences and 15 similarities between ELLEN SAGAR NURSING HOME, SUMMIT HILLS SKILLED NURSING FACILITY
 
General
City   Union vs   Spartanburg  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “City”

State attribute explanation   Sc vs   Sc  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”

Street   1817 Jonesville Highway vs   110 Summit Hills Drive  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Street”

Zip Code   29,379 vs   29,307  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Zip Code”

Phone   8,644,275,187 vs   8,645,912,222  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Phone”

Overall Star Rating   
2
vs   2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”

Health Inspections Star Rating   
1
vs   1
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”

Nurse Staffing Star Rating   
4
vs   4
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”

Quality Measures Star Rating   
4
vs   5
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”

RN Only Star Rating   
3
vs   3
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”

Number of Certified Beds   
113
vs   27
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”

Total Number of Residents   
112
vs   19
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”

Percent of Occupied Beds   
99 %
vs   70 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”

Health Survey Date   12/14/2011 vs   11/8/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”

Fire Survey Date   12/14/2011 vs   10/13/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”

Sprinkler Status   Fully Sprinklered vs   Fully Sprinklered  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”

Program Participation   Medicare And Medicaid vs   Medicare  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Program Participation”

Type of Ownership   Government - Hospital District vs   For Profit - Corporation  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”

Located Within a Hospital?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”

Multi Nursing Home Ownership?   No vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”

Resident and Family Councils   Both vs   Resident  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”

Continuing Care Retirement Community?   No vs   Yes  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”

Quality Indicator Survey?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”

Special Focus Facility?   No vs   No  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”

Civil Money Penalty Count   
6
vs   2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”

Total Enforcement Actions Count   
7
vs   2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”

# of deficiencies   
13
vs   10
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Add Comment about “General

cancel
Staff Information
Number of Residents   
112
vs   19
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of Residents”

Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.56
vs   1.35
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.49
vs   1.38
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day   
1.04
vs   2.74
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.02
vs   0.75
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day   
0.02
vs   0.75
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Add Comment about “Staff Information

cancel
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 10/07/2009date Of Correction: 11/12/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Environmental Deficiencies

cancel
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Keep Each Resident Free From Physical Restraints, Unless Needed For Medical Treatment.survey Date: 12/14/2011date Of Correction: 01/26/2012 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 11/08/2011date Of Correction: 12/16/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 09/20/2011date Of Correction: 10/28/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 09/20/2011date Of Correction: 10/28/2011 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 08/13/2009date Of Correction: 09/12/2009 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Add Comment about “Mistreatment Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1    vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 10/07/2009date Of Correction: 11/12/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Add Comment about “Resident Rights Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.survey Date: 09/20/2011date Of Correction: 10/28/2011 vs   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 11/08/2011date Of Correction: 12/16/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.survey Date: 05/17/2010date Of Correction: 06/17/2010 vs   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 10/07/2009date Of Correction: 11/12/2009  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 05/17/2010date Of Correction: 06/17/2010 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Deficiency #4   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 08/13/2009date Of Correction: 09/12/2009 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Add Comment about “Quality Care Deficiencies

cancel
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 12/14/2011date Of Correction: 01/26/2012 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.survey Date: 12/14/2011date Of Correction: 01/26/2012 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 08/13/2009date Of Correction: 09/12/2009 vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Add Comment about “Resident Assessment Deficiencies

cancel
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.survey Date: 08/13/2009date Of Correction: 09/12/2009 vs   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.survey Date: 11/08/2011date Of Correction: 12/16/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2    vs   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 11/08/2011date Of Correction: 12/16/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Deficiency #3    vs   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 11/08/2011date Of Correction: 12/16/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Add Comment about “Administration Deficiencies

cancel
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1   Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.survey Date: 05/17/2010date Of Correction: 06/17/2010 vs   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: At Least Once A Month, Have A Licensed Pharmacist Review Each Resident's Medication(s) And Report Any Irregularities To The Attending Doctor.survey Date: 11/08/2011date Of Correction: 12/16/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Deficiency #2    vs   Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.survey Date: 11/08/2011date Of Correction: 12/16/2011  
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Add Comment about “Pharmacy Service Deficiencies

cancel
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
17.5 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
2 %
vs   1.6 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
1.3 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
1.50 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
7.8 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
1.2 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
11.8:1
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
3 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
75.2 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain    vs   5.2 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
96.7 %
vs   93.5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
93.8 %
vs   96.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
13 %
vs   75.2
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
4.9 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q1

cancel
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication   
16.2 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”

Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased   
2.3 %
vs   0.8 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”

Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
6.3 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers   
1.9 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”

Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight   
9.1 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”

Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder   
38.1 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”

Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder   
1.4 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”

Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection   
8.5 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”

Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms   
6.5 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”

Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained   
75.2 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”

Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury   
4 %
vs     
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain   
9.4 / 10.4
vs   6.1 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”

Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine   
97.9 %
vs   87.9 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”

Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened   
94.9 %
vs   95 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”

Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication   
24.7 %
vs   5 %
 
 
[X]
Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Add Comment about “Quality Measures Q3

cancel

Compare ELLEN SAGAR NURSING HOME vs SUMMIT HILLS SKILLED NURSING FACILITY Nursing Homes USA


Scroll To Top

saved