Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
San Angelo
vs
Corpus Christi
State attribute explanation
Tx
vs
Tx
Street
902 N Main St
vs
1314 3rd Street
Zip Code
76,903
vs
78,401
Phone
3,256,557,391
vs
3,618,885,511
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
5
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
108
vs
114
Total Number of Residents
91
vs
80
Percent of Occupied Beds
84 %
vs
70 %
Health Survey Date
7/21/2011
vs
6/21/2012
Fire Survey Date
7/20/2011
vs
6/21/2012
Sprinkler Status
Partially Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Church Related
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
1
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
2
# of deficiencies
1
vs
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
91
vs
80
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.42
vs
1.05
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.88
vs
1.18
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.3
vs
2.23
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11
vs
0.12
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11
vs
0.12
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 01/14/2010date Of Correction: 02/19/2010
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.survey Date: 03/28/2011date Of Correction: 04/28/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 03/28/2011date Of Correction: 04/28/2011
Deficiency #3
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 03/30/2010date Of Correction: 03/31/2010
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.survey Date: 08/07/2009date Of Correction: 08/08/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.1 %
vs
32.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.8 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.3 %
vs
14 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.6:1
vs
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.3 %
vs
12.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.8 %
vs
9.4 / 10.4
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.2 %
vs
21.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.7 %
vs
27.8 (82.0)
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.7 %
vs
65.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.2 %
vs
56.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2 %
vs
3.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3 %
vs
1.50 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
26.3 (79.3)
vs
31.4 (88.5)
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.7 %
vs
0.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.8 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.9 %
vs
9.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.7 %
vs
5.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
52.7 %
vs
29.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.3 %
vs
9.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.1 %
vs
11.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.1 %
vs
18.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.8 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2 %
vs
1.50 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.7 %
vs
20.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.4 %
vs
63.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97 %
vs
58.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
24.1 %
vs
2.20 %
Compare ELSIE GAYER HEALTH CARE CENTER vs HARBOR VIEW CARE CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel