Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Sharon
vs
Boston
State attribute explanation
Ma
vs
Ma
Street
259 Norwood Street
vs
111 Orient Avenue
Zip Code
2,067
vs
2,128
Phone
7,817,846,781
vs
6,175,692,100
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
1
vs
3
RN Only Star Rating
5
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
66
vs
190
Total Number of Residents
57
vs
90
Percent of Occupied Beds
86 %
vs
47 %
Health Survey Date
2/27/2012
vs
5/15/2012
Fire Survey Date
3/27/2012
vs
6/18/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Partially Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
Non Profit - Church Related
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
4
vs
Staff Information
Number of Residents
57
vs
90
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.14
vs
0.73
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.72
vs
0.84
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.86
vs
1.57
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1
vs
0.06
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1
vs
0.06
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 01/11/2012date Of Correction: 02/16/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 01/11/2012date Of Correction: 02/16/2012
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Each Resident Enough Fluids To Keep Them Healthy And Prevent Dehydration.survey Date: 11/19/2009date Of Correction: 01/14/2010
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 11/19/2009date Of Correction: 01/14/2010
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22 %
vs
18.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.7 %
vs
3.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.5 %
vs
11.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.3 %
vs
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.7 %
vs
3.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.4 %
vs
9.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.5 %
vs
7.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.2 %
vs
4.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22 %
vs
15.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.7 %
vs
93.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
9.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 %
vs
4.5 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24 %
vs
20.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5 %
vs
1.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.7 %
vs
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
11 %
vs
9.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.5 %
vs
1.9 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.3 %
vs
37.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.6 / 3
vs
3.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.4 %
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.9 %
vs
5.6:1
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.9 %
vs
2.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.2 %
vs
5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20 %
vs
16.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.3 %
vs
96.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.5 %
vs
85.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
22.9 %
vs
19.4:1
Compare EPOCH SENIOR HEALTHCARE OF SHARON vs DON ORIONE NURSING HOME Nursing Homes USA
cancel