Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Eureka
vs
Los Angeles
State attribute explanation
Ca
vs
Ca
Street
2353 Twenty-third St
vs
2468 South St Andrews Place
Zip Code
95,501
vs
90,018
Phone
7,074,453,261
vs
3,237,310,641
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
vs
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
2
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
2
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
1
Number of Certified Beds
99
vs
151
Total Number of Residents
68
vs
151
Percent of Occupied Beds
69 %
vs
100 %
Health Survey Date
6/17/2011
vs
12/10/2011
Fire Survey Date
6/22/2011
vs
12/10/2011
Sprinkler Status
Partially Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Partnership
vs
Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
Yes
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
3
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
4
# of deficiencies
3
vs
1
Staff Information
Number of Residents
68
vs
151
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.54
vs
0.21
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.96
vs
1
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.50
vs
1.21
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04
vs
0.03
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04
vs
0.03
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 05/14/2009date Of Correction: 06/20/2009
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 08/25/2010date Of Correction: 10/25/2010
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 12/30/2009date Of Correction: 03/01/2011
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/05/2009date Of Correction: 01/17/2010
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.8 %
vs
11.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
39.6 %
vs
8.6:1
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10 %
vs
11.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.9 %
vs
9.4 / 10.4
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.1 %
vs
49.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5.3 %
vs
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 %
vs
15.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
20.6 %
vs
7.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
10 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
35.7 %
vs
22 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
26.9 %
vs
17.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
15.7 %
vs
22.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.1 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1 %
vs
1.4 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.7 %
vs
9.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.20 %
vs
1.50 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
42 %
vs
9.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.7 %
vs
10.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4 %
vs
11 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
31.6 %
vs
48.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.8 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.4 %
vs
12.8:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
15.8 %
vs
3.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
12.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 %
vs
2.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.1 %
vs
20.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
31.9 %
vs
18.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
17.4 %
vs
18.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
28.1 %
vs
11.6:1
Compare EUREKA REHABILITATION & WELLNESS CENTER, LP vs ST. JOHN OF GOD RETIREMENT Nursing Homes USA
cancel