Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Anderson
vs
Woodruff
State attribute explanation
Sc
vs
Sc
Street
208 James Street
vs
1114 East Georgia Road
Zip Code
29,625
vs
29,388
Phone
8,642,263,427
vs
8,644,767,092
Overall Star Rating
1
vs
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
2
Quality Measures Star Rating
1
vs
1
RN Only Star Rating
4
vs
2
Number of Certified Beds
88
vs
88
Total Number of Residents
83
vs
84
Percent of Occupied Beds
94 %
vs
95 %
Health Survey Date
1/4/2012
vs
11/16/2011
Fire Survey Date
1/5/2012
vs
11/15/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
None
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
4
vs
Staff Information
Number of Residents
83
vs
84
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.81
vs
0.39
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.74
vs
0.68
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.54
vs
1.08
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07
vs
0.07
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07
vs
0.07
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 11/08/2010date Of Correction: 11/30/2010
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 01/26/2011date Of Correction: 01/27/2011
vs
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 11/08/2010date Of Correction: 11/30/2010
vs
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Maintain Drug Records And Properly Mark/label Drugs And Other Similar Products According To Accepted Professional Standards.survey Date: 01/26/2011date Of Correction: 01/27/2011
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.5 %
vs
47.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
17.9 (64.2)
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.7 %
vs
5.6:1
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.9 %
vs
9.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
77.4 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4 %
vs
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.8 %
vs
7.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
14.8 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
19.7 %
vs
16.9-24
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
22.4:1
vs
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
100 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3 %
vs
3.6 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.6 %
vs
45.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.1 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
34.8 %
vs
16.3:1
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.6 %
vs
6.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.5 %
vs
9.9:1
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
76.5 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 %
vs
0.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.5 %
vs
7.9:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
21.5 %
vs
19.4:1
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.4 %
vs
32.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.7 %
vs
20.7 (69.3)
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.2 %
vs
62.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
99.6 %
vs
97.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
26.2 %
vs
6.8 %
Compare FELLOWSHIP HEALTH & REHAB OF ANDERSON, LLC vs WOODRUFF MANOR, LLC Nursing Homes USA
cancel