Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Danbury
vs
Torrington
State attribute explanation
Ct
vs
Ct
Street
13 Hakim St
vs
255 Roberts St
Zip Code
6,810
vs
6,790
Phone
2,037,443,366
vs
8,604,895,801
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
5
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
5
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
5
RN Only Star Rating
5
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
64
vs
160
Total Number of Residents
60
vs
153
Percent of Occupied Beds
94 %
vs
96 %
Health Survey Date
3/29/2012
vs
4/20/2011
Fire Survey Date
3/29/2012
vs
4/19/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
6
Staff Information
Number of Residents
60
vs
153
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.43
vs
0.66
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.49
vs
0.73
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.92
vs
1.38
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.14
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.14
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Honor All Of The Resident's Rights As A Resident Of The Nursing Home, Free Of Coercion And Reprisal, And As A Citizen Or Resident Of The United States.survey Date: 09/17/2010date Of Correction: 10/28/2010
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 10/22/2010date Of Correction: 12/03/2010
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 10/22/2010date Of Correction: 12/03/2010
Deficiency #3
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 09/17/2010date Of Correction: 10/28/2010
Deficiency #4
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 09/17/2010date Of Correction: 10/28/2010
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.survey Date: 09/17/2010date Of Correction: 10/28/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
42.9 %
vs
25 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.1 %
vs
4.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5 %
vs
6.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.2 %
vs
7.6 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
67.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.4 %
vs
1.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 %
vs
10 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10 %
vs
0.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.5 %
vs
12.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.1 %
vs
74.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
81.8 %
vs
75.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
9.1 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6 %
vs
3.1 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35.2 %
vs
26.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
0.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.3 %
vs
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.8 %
vs
4.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.6:1
vs
7.1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
66 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4 %
vs
0.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.5 %
vs
10.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
13.2 %
vs
0.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5 %
vs
4.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.3 (79.3)
vs
10.7:1
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.5 %
vs
70.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
81.4 %
vs
70.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
21 %
vs
18.7 %
Compare FILOSA, FOR NURSING & REHABILITATION vs LITCHFIELD WOODS HEALTH CARE C Nursing Homes USA
cancel