Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Danbury
vs
Cheshire
State attribute explanation
Ct
vs
Ct
Street
1 Glen Hill Rd
vs
745 Highland Ave
Zip Code
6,810
vs
6,410
Phone
2,037,442,840
vs
2,032,727,285
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
5
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
5
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
100
vs
120
Total Number of Residents
99
vs
112
Percent of Occupied Beds
99 %
vs
93 %
Health Survey Date
11/18/2011
vs
1/31/2012
Fire Survey Date
11/18/2011
vs
1/18/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Yes
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
5
Staff Information
Number of Residents
99
vs
112
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.59
vs
0.58
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77
vs
0.88
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.37
vs
1.46
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.29
vs
0.09
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.29
vs
0.09
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 01/31/2012date Of Correction: 03/09/2012
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.survey Date: 01/31/2012date Of Correction: 03/09/2012
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 01/31/2012date Of Correction: 03/09/2012
Deficiency #3
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 10/05/2009date Of Correction: 11/16/2009
Deficiency #4
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Receive Proper Treatment And Assistive Devices To Maintain Their Vision And Hearing.survey Date: 10/05/2009date Of Correction: 11/16/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.4:1
vs
31.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.9 %
vs
8.6:1
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.1 %
vs
8.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.3 %
vs
10.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.3 %
vs
3.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8 %
vs
6.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.3 %
vs
1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.6 %
vs
1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.1 %
vs
27.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.1 %
vs
82.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.6 %
vs
89.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4 %
vs
5.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1 %
vs
1 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.6 %
vs
32.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 %
vs
0.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.7 %
vs
8.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.5 %
vs
6.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7 %
vs
7.6 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
45.8 %
vs
35.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 %
vs
5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.1 %
vs
8.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.5 %
vs
1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.5 %
vs
0.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 %
vs
1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.9 %
vs
25.6 (78.1)
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.6 %
vs
82 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.6 %
vs
84.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
22.8 %
vs
15.7 %
Compare GLEN HILL REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER vs HIGHLANDS HEALTH CARE CENTER, THE Nursing Homes USA
cancel