Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Danbury
vs
Stamford
State attribute explanation
Ct
vs
Ct
Street
1 Glen Hill Rd
vs
53 Courtland Ave
Zip Code
6,810
vs
6,902
Phone
2,037,442,840
vs
2,033,518,300
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
5
Health Inspections Star Rating
5
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
5
RN Only Star Rating
5
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
100
vs
156
Total Number of Residents
99
vs
139
Percent of Occupied Beds
99 %
vs
89 %
Health Survey Date
11/18/2011
vs
2/8/2012
Fire Survey Date
11/18/2011
vs
2/8/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
Yes
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
5
Staff Information
Number of Residents
99
vs
139
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.59
vs
0.73
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77
vs
0.85
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2.37
vs
1.58
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.29
vs
0.04
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.29
vs
0.04
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 02/08/2012date Of Correction: 03/21/2012
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 02/08/2012date Of Correction: 03/21/2012
Deficiency #3
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 02/08/2012date Of Correction: 03/21/2012
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 02/08/2012date Of Correction: 03/21/2012
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 10/30/2009date Of Correction: 12/11/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.4:1
vs
29.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.9 %
vs
2.20 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.1 %
vs
4.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.3 %
vs
4.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
37.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.3 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.3 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.6 %
vs
5.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.1 %
vs
12 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.1 %
vs
97.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.6 %
vs
93.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1 %
vs
1.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.6 %
vs
26.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1 %
vs
0.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.7 %
vs
1.1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.5 %
vs
6.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
45.8 %
vs
41.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.1 %
vs
4.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.5 %
vs
0.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.5 %
vs
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2 %
vs
1.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
27.9 %
vs
8 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.6 %
vs
89.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.6 %
vs
86.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
22.8 %
vs
6.7 %
Compare GLEN HILL REHABILITATION & NURSING CENTER vs REGENCY HEIGHTS OF STAMFORD, LLC Nursing Homes USA
cancel