Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
La Porte
vs
New Harmony
State attribute explanation
In
vs
In
Street
1700
vs
251 Hwy 66
Zip Code
46,350
vs
47,631
Phone
2,193,626,234
vs
8,126,824,104
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
2
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
3
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
87
vs
96
Total Number of Residents
74
vs
78
Percent of Occupied Beds
85 %
vs
81 %
Health Survey Date
12/9/2011
vs
6/29/2011
Fire Survey Date
1/4/2012
vs
7/14/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
6
vs
Staff Information
Number of Residents
74
vs
78
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.66
vs
0.73
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.67
vs
0.74
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.33
vs
1.48
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14
vs
0.03
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14
vs
0.03
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 10/27/2009date Of Correction: 11/23/2009
vs
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 09/30/2011date Of Correction: 10/21/2011
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.survey Date: 06/28/2012date Of Correction: 07/23/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 06/28/2012date Of Correction: 07/23/2012
vs
Deficiency #3
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.survey Date: 09/30/2011date Of Correction: 10/21/2011
vs
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Nurse Aides Show They Have The Skills And Techniques To Be Able To Care For Residents' Needs.survey Date: 10/27/2009date Of Correction: 11/23/2009
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.5 %
vs
34.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.1 %
vs
11 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.8 %
vs
6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.5 %
vs
4.6 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
58.3 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.5 %
vs
6.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.7 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.5 %
vs
26.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
92.3 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 %
vs
4.5 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.3:1
vs
32.7 (90.9)
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 %
vs
2.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.1 %
vs
8.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.8 %
vs
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5 %
vs
4.3 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
57 %
vs
61.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.5 - 2.0
vs
1.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.5 %
vs
7.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.5 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
3.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.5 - 2.0
vs
3.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
14.8 %
vs
23 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.2 %
vs
98.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
85.1 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
12.4-2413.6-24
vs
24.2 %
Compare GOLDEN LIVING CENTER-LAPORTE vs NEW HARMONIE HEALTHCARE CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel