Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
New Madrid
vs
Maryville
State attribute explanation
Mo
vs
Mo
Street
1050 Dawson Road
vs
524 North Laura
Zip Code
63,869
vs
64,468
Phone
5,737,485,622
vs
6,605,827,447
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
2
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
112
vs
105
Total Number of Residents
89
vs
75
Percent of Occupied Beds
79 %
vs
71 %
Health Survey Date
5/10/2012
vs
4/12/2012
Fire Survey Date
5/10/2012
vs
4/12/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
1
vs
3
Staff Information
Number of Residents
89
vs
75
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.47
vs
0.48
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.64
vs
0.8
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.11
vs
1.28
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06
vs
0.06
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06
vs
0.06
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/21/2012date Of Correction: 04/17/2012
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/22/2009date Of Correction: 07/23/2009
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 10/01/2009date Of Correction: 10/23/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/22/2009date Of Correction: 07/23/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
44.7 %
vs
11 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.3 %
vs
9.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.1 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.3:1
vs
5.6:1
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
47.2 %
vs
42.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 %
vs
5.6:1
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
75.2 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.2 %
vs
4.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.9 (64.2)
vs
16.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
100 %
vs
79.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.3 %
vs
86.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6 %
vs
2.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
46.5 %
vs
14.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.9 %
vs
9.4 / 10.4
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.6:1
vs
1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.3:1
vs
6.6 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
45 %
vs
43.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.5 - 2.0
vs
6.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2 %
vs
2.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.1 %
vs
8.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1 %
vs
2.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
32.9 %
vs
19.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.3 %
vs
80.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.8 %
vs
86.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
15.4 %
Compare GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER-NEW MADRID vs GOLDEN LIVINGCENTER-MARYVILLE Nursing Homes USA
cancel