Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Evanston
vs
Staunton
State attribute explanation
Il
vs
Il
Street
500 Asbury Street
vs
215 West Pennsylvania Avenue
Zip Code
60,202
vs
62,088
Phone
8,473,163,320
vs
6,186,355,577
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
5
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
5
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
2
vs
2
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
2
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
124
vs
99
Total Number of Residents
92
vs
72
Percent of Occupied Beds
74 %
vs
73 %
Health Survey Date
1/20/2012
vs
4/26/2012
Fire Survey Date
2/22/2012
vs
4/26/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
None
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
1
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
3
vs
Staff Information
Number of Residents
92
vs
72
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.65
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.71
vs
0.73
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.36
vs
1.24
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14
vs
75.2
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.14
vs
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 04/03/2012date Of Correction: 05/18/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 02/28/2011date Of Correction: 03/03/2011
vs
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.survey Date: 04/03/2012date Of Correction: 05/18/2012
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.9 %
vs
25.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
6.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 %
vs
10 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5 %
vs
10.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.8 %
vs
8.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
44.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.7 %
vs
1.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
25 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.8 %
vs
2.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.7 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.3 %
vs
22.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.3 %
vs
97.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.8 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7 %
vs
7.2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.1 %
vs
28.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.6 %
vs
15.6 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.7 %
vs
8.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.7 %
vs
7.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
46.8 %
vs
44.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.2 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
14.5 %
vs
1.50 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.2 %
vs
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.1 %
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.1 %
vs
7.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.4 %
vs
17.3:1
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.9 %
vs
91.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
96.6 %
vs
99.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
22.1 (71.8)
Compare GROVE OF EVANSTON vs HERITAGE HEALTH-STAUNTON Nursing Homes USA
cancel