General
City		Detroit	vs	Detroit
	[X] Add Comment about “City”
State attribute explanation		Mi	vs	Mi
	[X] Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”
Street		6700 W Outer Dr	vs	18901 Meyers Rd
	[X] Add Comment about “Street”
Zip Code		48,235	vs	48,235
	[X] Add Comment about “Zip Code”
Phone		3,138,361,700	vs	3,138,648,481
	[X] Add Comment about “Phone”
Overall Star Rating		1	vs	2
	[X] Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”
Health Inspections Star Rating		1	vs	2
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”
Nurse Staffing Star Rating		2	vs	2
	[X] Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”
Quality Measures Star Rating		4	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”
RN Only Star Rating		1	vs	2
	[X] Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”
Number of Certified Beds		140	vs	141
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”
Total Number of Residents		126	vs	127
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”
Percent of Occupied Beds		90 %	vs	90 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”
Health Survey Date		10/7/2011	vs	1/13/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”
Fire Survey Date		10/6/2011	vs	1/12/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”
Sprinkler Status		Fully Sprinklered	vs	Fully Sprinklered
	[X] Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”
Program Participation		Medicare And Medicaid	vs	Medicare And Medicaid
	[X] Add Comment about “Program Participation”
Type of Ownership		For Profit - Individual	vs	For Profit - Corporation
	[X] Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”
Located Within a Hospital?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?		No	vs	Yes
	[X] Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”
Resident and Family Councils		Resident	vs	Both
	[X] Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”
Continuing Care Retirement Community?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”
Quality Indicator Survey?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”
Special Focus Facility?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”
Civil Money Penalty Count		2	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”
Total Enforcement Actions Count		2	vs	3
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”
# of deficiencies		14	vs	16
	[X] Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Staff Information
Number of Residents		126	vs	127
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Residents”
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.33	vs	0.4
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.94	vs	0.84
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day		1.27	vs	1.24
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.2	vs	0.14
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.2	vs	0.14
	[X] Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/18/2012date Of Correction: 06/25/2012	vs	Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 01/13/2012date Of Correction: 02/20/2012
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Maintain Comfortable And Safe Temperature Levels.survey Date: 07/15/2011date Of Correction: 08/17/2011	vs	Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Maintain Comfortable And Safe Temperature Levels.survey Date: 07/22/2011date Of Correction: 07/27/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 08/10/2009date Of Correction: 09/25/2009	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/23/2011date Of Correction: 06/14/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”
Deficiency #4			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 02/04/2011date Of Correction: 03/11/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”
Deficiency #5			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 01/07/2011date Of Correction: 02/27/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #5”
Deficiency #6			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 10/19/2010date Of Correction: 11/26/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #6”
Deficiency #7			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 11/04/2009date Of Correction: 12/11/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #7”

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 05/18/2012date Of Correction: 06/25/2012	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 12/08/2011date Of Correction: 12/09/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 05/18/2012date Of Correction: 06/25/2012	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 08/29/2011date Of Correction: 09/22/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3		Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 07/15/2011date Of Correction: 08/17/2011	vs	Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Protect Each Resident From All Abuse, Physical Punishment, And Being Separated From Others.survey Date: 01/07/2011date Of Correction: 02/27/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 06/08/2012date Of Correction: 06/25/2012	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 06/10/2011date Of Correction: 06/27/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 08/25/2010date Of Correction: 10/04/2010	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 05/18/2012date Of Correction: 06/25/2012	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 01/07/2011date Of Correction: 02/27/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.survey Date: 08/25/2010date Of Correction: 10/04/2010	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 07/07/2010date Of Correction: 08/20/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 08/25/2010date Of Correction: 10/04/2010	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 03/19/2010date Of Correction: 04/30/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”
Deficiency #4		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 08/25/2010date Of Correction: 10/04/2010	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 11/04/2009date Of Correction: 12/11/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1			vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 07/14/2011date Of Correction: 08/05/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/18/2012date Of Correction: 06/25/2012	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 07/15/2011date Of Correction: 08/17/2011	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		12.9 (55.2)	vs	3.6 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		0.9 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		5.1 %	vs	5.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		13.5 %	vs	13.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		3.5 %	vs	10.1:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder			vs	29.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		2 %	vs	4.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		4.7 %	vs	7.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		2.4 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		75.2 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		22.2:1	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		51.1 %	vs	57.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		41.6 %	vs	45.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		0.5 - 2.0	vs	75.2
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		4.7 %	vs	0.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		10.4 %	vs	5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		1.2 %	vs	1.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		6.4 %	vs	14.6 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		12.5 %	vs	15.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		3.3 %	vs	10.3:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		28.7 %	vs	30.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		1.3 %	vs	3.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		3.3 %	vs	6.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		3.3 %	vs	0.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		75.2 %	vs	75.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		2.4 %	vs	1.50 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		15.9:1	vs	28.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		51.6 %	vs	36.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		38.1 %	vs	28.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		1.50 %	vs	20.2 (68.4)
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Compare HARTFORD NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER vs OAKPOINTE SENIOR CARE AND REHAB CENTER Nursing Homes USA