Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Columbia
vs
Deridder
State attribute explanation
La
vs
La
Street
7726 Us Hwy. 165
vs
1420 Blankenship Dr
Zip Code
71,418
vs
70,634
Phone
3,186,499,800
vs
3,374,639,022
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
vs
2
RN Only Star Rating
1
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
99
vs
90
Total Number of Residents
67
vs
59
Percent of Occupied Beds
68 %
vs
66 %
Health Survey Date
6/23/2011
vs
7/15/2011
Fire Survey Date
6/21/2011
vs
7/14/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
5
Staff Information
Number of Residents
67
vs
59
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.3
vs
0.68
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.32
vs
1.1
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.62
vs
1.78
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.1
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.1
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 07/22/2010date Of Correction: 08/13/2010
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 07/22/2010date Of Correction: 08/13/2010
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have Enough Nurses To Care For Every Resident In A Way That Maximizes The Resident's Well Being.survey Date: 03/25/2010date Of Correction: 04/13/2010
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 07/22/2010date Of Correction: 08/13/2010
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Paid Feeding Assistants 1) Completed Training; 2) Works Under The Supervision Of A Rn Or Lpn; And 3) Feeds Only Residents Who Have No Complicated Feeding Problems.survey Date: 03/25/2010date Of Correction: 04/13/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.9 %
vs
38.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5 %
vs
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.3 %
vs
6 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
8.8 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
6.7 %
vs
4.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
10.5 %
vs
10 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.7 %
vs
3.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
5.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.1 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
75 %
vs
95 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5 %
vs
5.8 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.5 %
vs
35.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
3.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.2 %
vs
2.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.3:1
vs
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.5 %
vs
5.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.1:1
vs
38.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.7 %
vs
5.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.2 %
vs
17 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.5 - 2.0
vs
9.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
8.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.9 %
vs
7.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9 %
vs
5.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.1 %
vs
81.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
73 %
vs
87.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
20.1 %
vs
Compare HAVEN NURSING CENTER vs DERIDDER RETIREMENT & REHABILITATION CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel