Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
South Pasadena
vs
Brooksville
State attribute explanation
Fl
vs
Fl
Street
1820 Shore Dr S
vs
1445 Howell Ave
Zip Code
33,707
vs
34,601
Phone
7,273,849,300
vs
3,527,991,451
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
1
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
58
vs
120
Total Number of Residents
50
vs
116
Percent of Occupied Beds
86 %
vs
97 %
Health Survey Date
6/30/2011
vs
8/11/2011
Fire Survey Date
7/15/2011
vs
8/11/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Partnership
vs
For Profit - Partnership
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
3
vs
2
Staff Information
Number of Residents
50
vs
116
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77
vs
0.59
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.23
vs
0.87
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2
vs
1.46
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11
vs
0.04
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11
vs
0.04
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.survey Date: 04/12/2012date Of Correction: 05/11/2012
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give The Resident's Representative The Ability To Exercise The Resident's Rights.survey Date: 06/22/2010date Of Correction: 08/05/2010
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 06/30/2010date Of Correction: 08/05/2010
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 04/12/2012date Of Correction: 05/11/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 04/12/2012date Of Correction: 05/11/2012
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.9 / 15.3
vs
34.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.5 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
11.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.3 %
vs
5.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.4 %
vs
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
46.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 %
vs
4.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.7 %
vs
14.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
13.9 / 15.3
vs
1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.8 %
vs
4.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20 %
vs
8.1 / 8.8
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
70.7 %
vs
94.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
75.9 %
vs
96.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
2.20 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 %
vs
2.1 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.8:1
vs
33.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.5 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.1 %
vs
8.5 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
16.8 %
vs
6.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8 %
vs
5.5 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
65 %
vs
47.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.7 %
vs
5.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.4 %
vs
6.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12.6:1
vs
0.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.2 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.5 %
vs
16.9-24
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.4 %
vs
94 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
82.1 %
vs
94.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
13.1:1
vs
13.2 %
Compare HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTRE AT DOLPHINS VIEW vs HERON POINTE HEALTH AND REHABILITATION Nursing Homes USA
cancel