Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
South Pasadena
vs
Maitland
State attribute explanation
Fl
vs
Fl
Street
1820 Shore Dr S
vs
1700 Monroe Ave
Zip Code
33,707
vs
32,751
Phone
7,273,849,300
vs
4,076,472,092
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
3
Health Inspections Star Rating
3
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
1
vs
1
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
58
vs
180
Total Number of Residents
50
vs
140
Percent of Occupied Beds
86 %
vs
78 %
Health Survey Date
6/30/2011
vs
6/8/2012
Fire Survey Date
7/15/2011
vs
6/5/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Partnership
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
3
vs
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
50
vs
140
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.77
vs
0.85
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.23
vs
0.8
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
2
vs
1.65
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11
vs
0.09
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.11
vs
0.09
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.survey Date: 04/12/2012date Of Correction: 05/11/2012
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 12/07/2010date Of Correction: 01/07/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Each Resident Gets A Nutritional And Well Balanced Diet, Unless It Is Not Possible To Do So.survey Date: 12/07/2010date Of Correction: 01/07/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 12/07/2010date Of Correction: 01/07/2011
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 04/12/2012date Of Correction: 05/11/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 04/12/2012date Of Correction: 05/11/2012
vs
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Manylevel Of Harm: 1deficiency: Post Nurse Staffing Information/data On A Daily Basis.survey Date: 12/07/2010date Of Correction: 01/07/2011
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.9 / 15.3
vs
22.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.5 %
vs
0.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
vs
19.6 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
13.3 %
vs
6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.4 %
vs
9.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
20 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 %
vs
2.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.7 %
vs
8.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
13.9 / 15.3
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2.8 %
vs
5 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20 %
vs
22 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
70.7 %
vs
81.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
75.9 %
vs
80.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
1.50 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 %
vs
5 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.8:1
vs
22.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.5 %
vs
1.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.1 %
vs
21.9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
16.8 %
vs
10.1:1
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8 %
vs
11.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
65 %
vs
24.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.7 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.4 %
vs
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12.6:1
vs
1.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
4.2 %
vs
6.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5 %
vs
4.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.5 %
vs
22.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.4 %
vs
83 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
82.1 %
vs
84.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
13.1:1
vs
23.6 %
Compare HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTRE AT DOLPHINS VIEW vs REHABILITATION CENTER OF WINTER PARK, THE Nursing Homes USA
cancel