Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Galesburg
vs
Bloomingdale
State attribute explanation
Il
vs
Il
Street
280 East Losey Street
vs
275 East Army Trail Road
Zip Code
61,401
vs
60,108
Phone
3,093,432,166
vs
6,308,939,616
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
2
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
1
vs
2
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
1
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
84
vs
207
Total Number of Residents
67
vs
178
Percent of Occupied Beds
80 %
vs
86 %
Health Survey Date
1/11/2012
vs
8/12/2011
Fire Survey Date
1/11/2012
vs
8/17/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
2
vs
5
Staff Information
Number of Residents
67
vs
178
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.44
vs
0.7
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.89
vs
0.48
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.33
vs
1.17
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09
vs
0.05
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.09
vs
0.05
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 08/03/2011date Of Correction: 08/16/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 07/07/2010date Of Correction: 07/10/2010
Deficiency #3
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 04/09/2009date Of Correction: 06/30/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Assist Those Residents Who Need Total Help With Eating/drinking, Grooming And Personal And Oral Hygiene.survey Date: 08/04/2009date Of Correction: 08/18/2009
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 04/09/2009date Of Correction: 05/01/2009
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 04/09/2009date Of Correction: 05/01/2009
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.survey Date: 08/04/2009date Of Correction: 08/18/2009
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10 %
vs
26.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
24.8 %
vs
0.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.1 %
vs
10.7:1
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
19.6 %
vs
10.2 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
61.3 %
vs
27.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
8.9 / 9.9
vs
4.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.9 %
vs
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
1.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.1 %
vs
2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.7 %
vs
44.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.9 %
vs
40.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.9 %
vs
7.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.9 / 9.9
vs
27.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.4:1
vs
0.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.4 %
vs
10.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
18.7 %
vs
11.9 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
51.3 %
vs
30.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
13.1:1
vs
3.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.1 %
vs
4.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
1.50 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.9 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.4 %
vs
7.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.6 %
vs
2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.9 %
vs
29.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.9 %
vs
40.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
27.4 %
vs
3.5 %
Compare HEARTLAND OF GALESBURG vs ALDEN VALLEY RIDGE REHAB & HCC Nursing Homes USA
cancel