Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Shelbyville
vs
Peru
State attribute explanation
In
vs
In
Street
2309 S Miller St
vs
390 W Boulevard
Zip Code
46,176
vs
46,970
Phone
3,173,989,781
vs
7,654,734,900
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
5
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
1
vs
2
Quality Measures Star Rating
1
vs
3
RN Only Star Rating
1
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
141
vs
36
Total Number of Residents
85
vs
34
Percent of Occupied Beds
60 %
vs
94 %
Health Survey Date
10/24/2011
vs
2/23/2012
Fire Survey Date
10/24/2011
vs
3/9/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
2
# of deficiencies
3
vs
3
Staff Information
Number of Residents
85
vs
34
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.31
vs
0.63
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.16
vs
0.63
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.48
vs
1.26
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07
vs
0.03
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.07
vs
0.03
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/21/2009date Of Correction: 06/19/2009
vs
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 05/11/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Properly Care For Residents Needing Special Services, Including: Injections, Colostomy, Ureostomy, Ileostomy, Tracheostomy Care, Tracheal Suctioning, Respiratory Care, Foot Care, And Prostheses.survey Date: 05/11/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 05/11/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: At Least Once A Month, Have A Licensed Pharmacist Review Each Resident's Medication(s) And Report Any Irregularities To The Attending Doctor.survey Date: 05/26/2010date Of Correction: 06/11/2010
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Make Sure That Each Resident's Drug Regimen Is Free From Unnecessary Drugs; 2) Each Resident's Entire Drug/medication Is Managed And Monitored To Achieve Highest Well Being.survey Date: 05/26/2010date Of Correction: 06/11/2010
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
30.6 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.3 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.50 %
vs
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14.3 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8 %
vs
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.9 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.6 / 3
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
16.3:1
vs
16.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.7 %
vs
19.4:1
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.4 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.6 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
72.4 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.9 %
vs
9.7 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32 %
vs
27.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.4 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5 %
vs
14.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
14 %
vs
12.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.6:1
vs
7.5 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
39.4 %
vs
65.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.2 %
vs
1.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
11.1 %
vs
14.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.9 %
vs
14.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
1.6 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.5 %
vs
14.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
18.9 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.3 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
76.5 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
28.3 %
vs
Compare HERITAGE HOUSE OF SHELBYVILLE vs HICKORY CREEK AT PERU Nursing Homes USA
cancel