Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Scottsboro
vs
Carbon Hill
State attribute explanation
Al
vs
Al
Street
380 Woods Cove Road
vs
350 Northeast 4th Street P O Box 30
Zip Code
35,768
vs
35,549
Phone
2,562,183,708
vs
2,059,244,404
Overall Star Rating
3
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
vs
4
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
vs
3
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
50
vs
59
Total Number of Residents
46
vs
48
Percent of Occupied Beds
92 %
vs
81 %
Health Survey Date
1/12/2012
vs
1/20/2012
Fire Survey Date
1/11/2012
vs
1/24/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Government - County
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
Yes
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
8
vs
1
Staff Information
Number of Residents
46
vs
48
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.69
vs
0.58
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.25
vs
1.52
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.94
vs
2.09
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06
vs
0.01
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06
vs
0.01
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 01/12/2012date Of Correction: 02/16/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Housekeeping And Maintenance Services.survey Date: 01/12/2012date Of Correction: 02/16/2012
vs
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.survey Date: 01/12/2012date Of Correction: 02/16/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Try To Resolve Each Resident's Complaints Quickly.survey Date: 11/19/2009date Of Correction: 12/24/2009
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 01/12/2012date Of Correction: 02/16/2012
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 05/06/2010date Of Correction: 06/09/2010
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Each Resident Receives An Accurate Assessment By A Qualified Health Professional.survey Date: 03/02/2012date Of Correction: 03/08/2012
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 11/19/2009date Of Correction: 12/24/2009
vs
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Food In A Way That Meets A Resident's Needs.survey Date: 01/12/2012date Of Correction: 02/16/2012
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
35.1 %
vs
27.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.9 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.8:1
vs
9.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
31.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
7 %
vs
1.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6 / 3
vs
7.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5 %
vs
2 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.5 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
94.7 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 %
vs
2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
32.4 (90.3)
vs
31.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.8 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.3:1
vs
35.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.4 %
vs
7.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
15.2 %
vs
6.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
41.5 %
vs
27.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.5 %
vs
2.6 / 3
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.8 %
vs
8.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.8 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
5.1 %
vs
0.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 %
vs
2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
26.9 %
vs
52.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.6 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.3 %
vs
97.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
15.4 %
vs
13.6-28
Compare HIGHLANDS HEALTH AND REHAB vs WALKER REHABILITATION CENTER, INC Nursing Homes USA
cancel