Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Holden
vs
Fall River
State attribute explanation
Ma
vs
Ma
Street
32 Mayo Road
vs
538 Robeson Street
Zip Code
1520
vs
2,720
Phone
5,088,294,327
vs
5,086,796,172
Overall Star Rating
2
vs
5
Health Inspections Star Rating
2
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
5
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
100
vs
62
Total Number of Residents
87
vs
56
Percent of Occupied Beds
87 %
vs
90 %
Health Survey Date
3/22/2012
vs
9/30/2011
Fire Survey Date
4/26/2012
vs
10/26/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
1
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
1
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
2
vs
3
Staff Information
Number of Residents
87
vs
56
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.65
vs
0.81
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.94
vs
1.07
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.59
vs
1.88
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.04
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.04
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 09/27/2010date Of Correction: 12/06/2010
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 05/18/2011date Of Correction: 07/07/2011
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give The Resident's Representative The Ability To Exercise The Resident's Rights.survey Date: 05/27/2009date Of Correction: 06/19/2009
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 12/15/2010date Of Correction: 12/10/2010
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 06/22/2010date Of Correction: 07/23/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.9-28
vs
36.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.50 %
vs
5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.1 %
vs
9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.1 %
vs
4.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
14.5 %
vs
8.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3 %
vs
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.8 %
vs
2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.6 %
vs
42.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.8:1
vs
14.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.5 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
88.7 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
5 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.9 %
vs
2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.3 %
vs
32.7 (90.9)
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.5 - 2.0
vs
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
16.4 %
vs
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.3 %
vs
4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
13.4 %
vs
6.1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
58.4 %
vs
43.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.7 %
vs
3.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.4 %
vs
4.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.8 %
vs
38.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1 %
vs
2.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
17.5 %
vs
21.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.9 %
vs
96.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
92.1 %
vs
94.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
14.8 %
vs
1.3 %
Compare HOLDEN REHABILITATION & SKILLED NURSING CENTER INC vs FALL RIVER JEWISH HOME, INC Nursing Homes USA
cancel