Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Denver
vs
Denver
State attribute explanation
Co
vs
Co
Street
6000 East Iliff Avenue
vs
6060 East Iliff Avenue
Zip Code
80,222
vs
80,222
Phone
3,037,575,441
vs
3,037,594,221
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
5
vs
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
2
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
vs
3
RN Only Star Rating
4
vs
2
Number of Certified Beds
133
vs
120
Total Number of Residents
114
vs
110
Percent of Occupied Beds
86 %
vs
92 %
Health Survey Date
5/3/2012
vs
10/20/2011
Fire Survey Date
5/31/2012
vs
11/9/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Individual
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
vs
5
Staff Information
Number of Residents
114
vs
110
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.67
vs
0.59
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.01
vs
0.92
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.69
vs
1.51
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.09
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.05
vs
0.09
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 04/16/2009date Of Correction: 05/15/2009
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 04/16/2009date Of Correction: 05/15/2009
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible.survey Date: 04/16/2009date Of Correction: 05/15/2009
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 04/16/2009date Of Correction: 05/15/2009
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Safely Provide Drugs And Other Similar Products Available, Which Are Needed Every Day And In Emergencies, By A Licensed Pharmacist.survey Date: 04/16/2009date Of Correction: 05/15/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.6 %
vs
21.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.2 %
vs
3.9 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
7.5 %
vs
13.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.5 %
vs
3.1 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
60.6 %
vs
63 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.2 %
vs
4.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.9 %
vs
8.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.6 %
vs
11.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.5 %
vs
30.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
85.5 %
vs
54.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
93.2 %
vs
47.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
9.1 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9 %
vs
7.1 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.1:1
vs
20 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.4 %
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.1 %
vs
3.2 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.6 %
vs
13.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.8 %
vs
4.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
66.7 %
vs
57.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.5 %
vs
6.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.6 %
vs
10.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.4 %
vs
10.7:1
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
1.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3 %
vs
5.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.7 %
vs
24.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.6 %
vs
63.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
87.8 %
vs
60.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
30.9 %
vs
12.3:1
Compare HOLLY HEIGHTS CARE CENTER vs HIGHLINE REHABILITATION AND CARE COMMUNITY Nursing Homes USA
cancel