Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Indianapolis
vs
Greenfield
State attribute explanation
In
vs
In
Street
7001 Hoover Rd
vs
5430 W Us 40
Zip Code
46,260
vs
46,140
Phone
3,172,512,261
vs
3,178,943,301
Overall Star Rating
4
vs
2
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
3
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
188
vs
60
Total Number of Residents
169
vs
47
Percent of Occupied Beds
90 %
vs
78 %
Health Survey Date
5/8/2012
vs
5/12/2011
Fire Survey Date
5/18/2012
vs
6/14/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
2
# of deficiencies
1
vs
6
Staff Information
Number of Residents
169
vs
48
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.59
vs
0.58
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.81
vs
1.05
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.4
vs
1.63
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04
vs
0.01
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.04
vs
0.01
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 06/15/2011date Of Correction: 07/12/2011
Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 06/15/2011date Of Correction: 08/03/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 06/15/2011date Of Correction: 08/03/2011
Deficiency #3
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 06/15/2011date Of Correction: 07/12/2011
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 03/07/2012date Of Correction: 03/14/2012
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 06/15/2011date Of Correction: 07/12/2011
Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Store, Cook, And Serve Food In A Safe And Clean Way.survey Date: 02/19/2010date Of Correction: 03/19/2010
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
24 %
vs
57.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.3 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.9 %
vs
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.7 %
vs
25.6 (78.1)
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
78.8 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9 %
vs
9.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.7 %
vs
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
4.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
20.4 %
vs
14.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.7 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
86.4 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.5 %
vs
75.2 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
23.3 %
vs
62.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4 %
vs
4.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
23.9 %
vs
5.4 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
8.5 %
vs
15.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8 %
vs
19.7 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
73 %
vs
33.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.7 %
vs
5.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.4 %
vs
2.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.4 %
vs
7.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.3 %
vs
18.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.4 %
vs
95.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
87.3 %
vs
13.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
20.6 %
vs
6.5 %
Compare HOOVERWOOD vs SUGAR CREEK REHABILITATION AND CONVALESCENT CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel