Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Issaquah
vs
Anacortes
State attribute explanation
Wa
vs
Wa
Street
805 Front Street
vs
911 21st Street
Zip Code
98,027
vs
98,221
Phone
4,253,921,271
vs
3,602,937,222
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
5
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
5
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
4
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
2
RN Only Star Rating
4
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
140
vs
52
Total Number of Residents
116
vs
48
Percent of Occupied Beds
83 %
vs
92 %
Health Survey Date
11/7/2011
vs
3/2/2012
Fire Survey Date
11/7/2011
vs
3/6/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Individual
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
3
vs
2
Staff Information
Number of Residents
116
vs
48
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.9
vs
0.89
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.53
vs
0.9
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.43
vs
1.78
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15
vs
0.32
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.15
vs
0.32
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/08/2011date Of Correction: 04/08/2011
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 10/25/2010date Of Correction: 12/01/2010
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 06/16/2009date Of Correction: 06/23/2009
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care For Residents In A Way That Keeps Or Builds Each Resident's Dignity And Respect Of Individuality.survey Date: 01/25/2010date Of Correction: 03/19/2010
vs
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 06/10/2009date Of Correction: 07/14/2009
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
36.9 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.4 %
vs
3.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
75.2 %
vs
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.8 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.7 %
vs
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
76.5 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
3.6 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.5 %
vs
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.6 %
vs
25 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.8 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.9 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.7 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 %
vs
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
41.5 %
vs
32.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.9 %
vs
2.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.50 %
vs
17.6 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.4 %
vs
10.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5 %
vs
6.5 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
76.4 %
vs
68.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.1 %
vs
6.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1 %
vs
12 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.1 %
vs
11 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.8 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5 %
vs
29.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.9 %
vs
100 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
97.8 %
vs
98.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2 %
vs
10.5 %
Compare ISSAQUAH NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER vs SAN JUAN REHAB AND CARE CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel