Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Clinton
vs
Great Neck
State attribute explanation
Ny
vs
Ny
Street
110 Utica Road
vs
199 Community Drive
Zip Code
13,323
vs
11,021
Phone
3,158,535,515
vs
5,163,659,229
Overall Star Rating
1
vs
5
Health Inspections Star Rating
1
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
1
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
4
vs
5
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
280
vs
200
Total Number of Residents
261
vs
180
Percent of Occupied Beds
93 %
vs
90 %
Health Survey Date
8/19/2011
vs
4/3/2012
Fire Survey Date
8/19/2011
vs
4/3/2012
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
Non Profit - Church Related
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
No
vs
No
Resident and Family Councils
Both
vs
Both
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
3
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
4
vs
1
Staff Information
Number of Residents
261
vs
180
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.43
vs
0.8
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.88
vs
0.8
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.3
vs
1.6
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06
vs
0.09
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.06
vs
0.09
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 08/17/2011date Of Correction: 10/01/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Give Proper Treatment To Residents With Feeding Tubes To Prevent Problems (such As Aspiration Pneumonia, Diarrhea, Vomiting, Dehydration, Metabolic Abnormalities, Nasal-pharyngeal Ulcers) And Help Restore Eating Skills, If Possible.survey Date: 05/23/2011date Of Correction: 07/01/2011
vs
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.survey Date: 05/23/2011date Of Correction: 07/01/2011
vs
Deficiency #2
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Choose A Doctor To Serve As The Medical Director To Create Resident Care Policies And Coordinate Medical Care In The Facility.survey Date: 05/23/2011date Of Correction: 07/01/2011
vs
Deficiency #3
Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 05/23/2011date Of Correction: 07/01/2011
vs
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.9 %
vs
21.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.9 %
vs
4.6 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.6 %
vs
5.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.7 %
vs
3.8 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
59.3 %
vs
51.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1 %
vs
0.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.2 %
vs
4.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
37 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.4 %
vs
1.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.5 %
vs
14.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
92 %
vs
89.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
90.9 %
vs
93.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.3 %
vs
3.8 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.4 %
vs
21.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.9 %
vs
0.5 - 2.0
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.1 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.9 %
vs
7.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.2 %
vs
6.4 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
59.7 %
vs
66.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1 %
vs
1.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.3 %
vs
4.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.2 %
vs
22.1 (71.8)
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
0.9 %
vs
1.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.2 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
15.8 %
vs
11.5 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
88 %
vs
56.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
86.8 %
vs
91.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
20.6 %
vs
12.3:1
Compare KATHERINE LUTHER RESIDENTIAL HLTH CARE & REHAB vs HIGHFIELD GARDENS CARE CENTER OF GREAT NECK Nursing Homes USA
cancel