Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Fall River
vs
North Adams
State attribute explanation
Ma
vs
Ma
Street
495 New Boston Road
vs
175 Franklin Street
Zip Code
2,720
vs
1247
Phone
5,086,790,106
vs
4,136,644,041
Overall Star Rating
1
vs
1
Health Inspections Star Rating
1
vs
1
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
2
vs
3
Quality Measures Star Rating
2
vs
4
RN Only Star Rating
2
vs
3
Number of Certified Beds
124
vs
119
Total Number of Residents
118
vs
109
Percent of Occupied Beds
95 %
vs
92 %
Health Survey Date
3/20/2012
vs
9/7/2011
Fire Survey Date
4/11/2012
vs
9/20/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Partnership
vs
Non Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
No
vs
No
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
2
vs
3
Total Enforcement Actions Count
2
vs
3
# of deficiencies
vs
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
118
vs
109
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.41
vs
0.68
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.95
vs
0.69
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.35
vs
1.37
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1
vs
0.08
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.1
vs
0.08
Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 06/30/2011date Of Correction: 08/09/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 06/30/2011date Of Correction: 08/09/2011
Deficiency #2
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Provide Necessary Care And Services To Maintain The Highest Well Being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 04/07/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
Deficiency #3
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Give Residents Proper Treatment To Prevent New Bed (pressure) Sores Or Heal Existing Bed Sores.survey Date: 03/01/2010date Of Correction: 04/26/2010
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28.7 %
vs
36.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.6 %
vs
2.20 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.4 %
vs
12.1:1
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
9 %
vs
5.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.2 %
vs
4.6 %
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
vs
40.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4 %
vs
5.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.3 %
vs
3.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1 %
vs
4.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
2 %
vs
1.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
21.6 %
vs
16 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.1 %
vs
98.6 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
98.1 %
vs
97.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
75.2
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.1 %
vs
4.5 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
28 %
vs
31.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.6 / 3
vs
0.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.4 %
vs
9.8 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
10.8 %
vs
4.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.7 %
vs
2.6 / 3
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
51.5 %
vs
40.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
5 %
vs
7.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.3 %
vs
3.3 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3 %
vs
4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
3 %
vs
0.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6 %
vs
4.3 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.7 %
vs
17.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.2 %
vs
98.4 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
95.3 %
vs
96.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
16.7 %
vs
75.2 %
Compare KIMWELL vs NORTH ADAMS COMMONS NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTE Nursing Homes USA
cancel