General
City		Bowling Green	vs	Hazard
	[X] Add Comment about “City”
State attribute explanation		Ky	vs	Ky
	[X] Add Comment about “State attribute explanation”
Street		550 High St.	vs	390 Park Avenue, P O Box 1329
	[X] Add Comment about “Street”
Zip Code		42,101	vs	41,702
	[X] Add Comment about “Zip Code”
Phone		2,708,433,296	vs	6,064,392,306
	[X] Add Comment about “Phone”
Overall Star Rating		1	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “Overall Star Rating”
Health Inspections Star Rating		1	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Inspections Star Rating”
Nurse Staffing Star Rating		2	vs	2
	[X] Add Comment about “Nurse Staffing Star Rating”
Quality Measures Star Rating		2	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Measures Star Rating”
RN Only Star Rating		3	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “RN Only Star Rating”
Number of Certified Beds		176	vs	200
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Certified Beds”
Total Number of Residents		150	vs	193
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Residents”
Percent of Occupied Beds		85 %	vs	97 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of Occupied Beds”
Health Survey Date		6/15/2012	vs	10/20/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Health Survey Date”
Fire Survey Date		6/13/2012	vs	10/20/2011
	[X] Add Comment about “Fire Survey Date”
Sprinkler Status		Fully Sprinklered	vs	Fully Sprinklered
	[X] Add Comment about “Sprinkler Status”
Program Participation		Medicare And Medicaid	vs	Medicare And Medicaid
	[X] Add Comment about “Program Participation”
Type of Ownership		For Profit - Corporation	vs	For Profit - Corporation
	[X] Add Comment about “Type of Ownership”
Located Within a Hospital?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Located Within a Hospital?”
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?		Yes	vs	Yes
	[X] Add Comment about “Multi Nursing Home Ownership?”
Resident and Family Councils		Resident	vs	Resident
	[X] Add Comment about “Resident and Family Councils”
Continuing Care Retirement Community?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Continuing Care Retirement Community?”
Quality Indicator Survey?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Quality Indicator Survey?”
Special Focus Facility?		No	vs	No
	[X] Add Comment about “Special Focus Facility?”
Civil Money Penalty Count		2	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “Civil Money Penalty Count”
Total Enforcement Actions Count		3	vs	1
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Enforcement Actions Count”
# of deficiencies		19	vs	7
	[X] Add Comment about “# of deficiencies”

Staff Information
Number of Residents		150	vs	193
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of Residents”
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.64	vs	0.33
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.61	vs	0.86
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day		1.25	vs	1.19
	[X] Add Comment about “Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.04	vs	0.09
	[X] Add Comment about “Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day”
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day		0.04	vs	0.09
	[X] Add Comment about “Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day”

Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Have A Program That Investigates, Controls And Keeps Infection From Spreading.survey Date: 03/15/2011date Of Correction: 04/07/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 05/12/2009date Of Correction: 06/05/2009
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 10/08/2010date Of Correction: 10/16/2010	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3		Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 09/22/2010date Of Correction: 10/16/2010	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”
Deficiency #4		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 03/04/2010date Of Correction: 04/16/2010	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #4”
Deficiency #5		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 11/10/2009date Of Correction: 12/24/2009	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #5”
Deficiency #6		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 09/30/2009date Of Correction: 10/22/2009	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #6”
Deficiency #7		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 04/17/2009date Of Correction: 05/22/2009	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #7”

Mistreatment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 04/15/2011date Of Correction: 05/23/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 06/01/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: 1) Hire Only People With No Legal History Of Abusing, Neglecting Or Mistreating Residents; Or 2) Report And Investigate Any Acts Or Reports Of Abuse, Neglect Or Mistreatment Of Residents.survey Date: 10/08/2010date Of Correction: 10/16/2010	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Write And Use Policies That Forbid Mistreatment, Neglect And Abuse Of Residents And Theft Of Residents' Property.survey Date: 06/01/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop Policies That Prevent Mistreatment, Neglect, Or Abuse Of Residents Or Theft Of Resident Property.survey Date: 12/17/2009date Of Correction: 12/25/2009	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Resident Rights Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Immediately Tell The Resident, The Resident's Doctor And A Family Member Of The Resident Of Situations (injury/decline/room, Etc.) That Affect The Resident.survey Date: 03/04/2010date Of Correction: 04/16/2010	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”

Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 03/15/2011date Of Correction: 04/07/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Provide Medically-related Social Services To Help Each Resident Achieve The Highest Possible Quality Of Life.survey Date: 06/01/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 11/10/2009date Of Correction: 12/24/2009	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Provide Care By Qualified Persons According To Each Resident's Written Plan Of Care.survey Date: 09/30/2009date Of Correction: 10/22/2009	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 10/08/2010date Of Correction: 11/22/2010	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Conduct Initial And Periodic Assessments Of Each Resident's Functional Capacity.survey Date: 06/01/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Allow The Resident The Right To Participate In The Planning Or Revision Of The Resident's Care Plan.survey Date: 09/22/2010date Of Correction: 09/23/2010	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”

Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1		Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Quickly Tell The Resident's Doctor The Results Of Lab Tests.survey Date: 04/15/2011date Of Correction: 05/23/2011	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Set Up An Ongoing Quality Assessment And Assurance Group To Review Quality Deficiencies Quarterly, And Develop Corrective Plans Of Action.survey Date: 06/01/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #1”
Deficiency #2		Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Keep Accurate, Complete And Organized Clinical Records On Each Resident That Meet Professional Standards.survey Date: 09/22/2010date Of Correction: 09/23/2010	vs	Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 06/01/2010date Of Correction: 06/02/2010
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #2”
Deficiency #3		Scope: Somelevel Of Harm: 4deficiency: Be Administered In An Acceptable Way That Maintains The Well-being Of Each Resident .survey Date: 09/22/2010date Of Correction: 09/23/2010	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Deficiency #3”

Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		25.4 %	vs	34.6 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		2.6 / 3	vs	3.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		17.6 %	vs	28.5 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		5.2 %	vs	11.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		5 %	vs	5.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		27.5 %	vs	25.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		2.5 %	vs	4.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		2.9 %	vs	3.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		75.2 %	vs	16.3:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		3.5 %	vs	3.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		41.5 %	vs
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		88.9 %	vs	88.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		87 %	vs	84.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		75.2 %	vs	3.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		0.7 %	vs	5.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”

Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication		26.9 %	vs	34.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication”
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased		2.8 %	vs	5.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased”
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		17.7 %	vs	32 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers		5.1 %	vs	13.9 / 15.3
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers ”
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight		6.8 %	vs	5.3 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight ”
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder		22.8 %	vs	28.6 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder”
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder		3.9 %	vs	7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder ”
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection		3.3 %	vs	5.1 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection ”
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms		75.2 %	vs	13.7 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms”
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained		5.3 %	vs	3.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained”
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury		1.2 %	vs	6.2 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury”
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain		43.6 %	vs	54.8 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain ”
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine		92.9 %	vs	86.4 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine ”
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened		94.2 %	vs	83.9 %
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened”
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication		75.2 %	vs	12.6:1
	[X] Add Comment about “Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication ”

Compare KINDRED TRANSITIONAL CARE AND REHABILITATION ROSEW vs HAZARD HEALTH & REHABILITATION CENTER Nursing Homes USA