Add another Item to this comparison
Add Item
All attributes
Differences
Similarities
General
City
Windsor
vs
Naugatuck
State attribute explanation
Ct
vs
Ct
Street
581 Poquonock Ave
vs
4 Hazel Ave
Zip Code
6,095
vs
6,770
Phone
8,606,887,211
vs
2,037,231,456
Overall Star Rating
5
vs
4
Health Inspections Star Rating
4
vs
3
Nurse Staffing Star Rating
3
vs
4
Quality Measures Star Rating
5
vs
2
RN Only Star Rating
3
vs
4
Number of Certified Beds
108
vs
120
Total Number of Residents
101
vs
104
Percent of Occupied Beds
94 %
vs
87 %
Health Survey Date
10/4/2011
vs
7/28/2011
Fire Survey Date
10/4/2011
vs
7/27/2011
Sprinkler Status
Fully Sprinklered
vs
Fully Sprinklered
Program Participation
Medicare And Medicaid
vs
Medicare And Medicaid
Type of Ownership
For Profit - Corporation
vs
For Profit - Corporation
Located Within a Hospital?
No
vs
No
Multi Nursing Home Ownership?
Yes
vs
Yes
Resident and Family Councils
Resident
vs
Resident
Continuing Care Retirement Community?
No
vs
No
Quality Indicator Survey?
Yes
vs
Yes
Special Focus Facility?
No
vs
No
Civil Money Penalty Count
75.2
vs
75.2
Total Enforcement Actions Count
75.2
vs
75.2
# of deficiencies
1
vs
4
Staff Information
Number of Residents
101
vs
104
Number of RN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.62
vs
0.94
Number of LPN/LVN Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.8
vs
0.76
Total Number of Licensed Staff Hours Per Resident Per Day
1.43
vs
1.7
Number of CNA Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.17
vs
0.29
Number Therapy Hours Per Resident Per Day
0.17
vs
0.29
Environmental Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 3deficiency: Make Sure That The Nursing Home Area Is Free From Accident Hazards And Risks And Provides Supervision To Prevent Avoidable Accidents.survey Date: 07/28/2011date Of Correction: 09/07/2011
Quality Care Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure Services Provided By The Nursing Facility Meet Professional Standards Of Quality.survey Date: 06/01/2009date Of Correction: 07/10/2009
Resident Assessment Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Develop A Complete Care Plan That Meets All Of A Resident's Needs, With Timetables And Actions That Can Be Measured.survey Date: 07/28/2011date Of Correction: 09/07/2011
Administration Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Choose A Doctor To Serve As The Medical Director To Create Resident Care Policies And Coordinate Medical Care In The Facility.survey Date: 02/04/2010date Of Correction: 03/18/2010
vs
Pharmacy Service Deficiencies
Deficiency #1
vs
Scope: Fewlevel Of Harm: 2deficiency: Make Sure That Residents Are Safe From Serious Medication Errors.survey Date: 06/01/2009date Of Correction: 07/10/2009
Quality Measures Q1
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.8 %
vs
15.1 %
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
75.2 %
vs
1.4 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7 %
vs
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.3 %
vs
12.7 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.4 %
vs
10.8 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.4 %
vs
9.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.7 %
vs
6.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
25.8 %
vs
26.1 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
68.5 %
vs
93.8 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
62.2 %
vs
92.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.8 %
vs
75.2
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
75.2 %
vs
6.9 %
Quality Measures Q3
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.7 (69.3)
vs
15.9:1
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.4 %
vs
0.9 %
Percent of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9 %
vs
6.1 %
Percent of long-stay high-risk residents with pressure ulcers
4 %
vs
9.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4 %
vs
9.4 / 10.4
Percent of long-stay low-risk residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
49.4 %
vs
48.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have had a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.3 %
vs
7.5 %
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4 %
vs
9.6 %
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents who were physically restrained
75.2 %
vs
75.2 %
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.4 %
vs
6.2 %
Percent of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
19.5-24
vs
30.7 %
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and given, appropriately, the seasonal influenza vaccine
64.5 %
vs
92.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents with Pressure ulcers that are new or worsened
57.1 %
vs
91.9 %
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
20.3 %
vs
19.7 %
Compare KINDRED TRANSITIONAL CARE & REHAB-WINDSOR vs GLENDALE CENTER Nursing Homes USA
cancel